Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets there is no need to go to the cinema. Others say that to be fully enjoyed, films need to be seen in a cinema. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Thanks to the development of technology, individuals nowadays can watch videos and films on smartphones or tablets. However, there is a fair amount of people support the idea that it is better to enjoy films in a cinema rather than to watch on personal devices. In my sentiment, I totally agree with this argument. This essay is going to discuss both opinions and my view.
To begin with, it is fair enough to say people do not need to go theatre to see films that they can watch from their smartphones or tables at home. There is a fact that the cost to watch a film on Internet is cheaper than the ticket in cinema. For example, individuals only need to pay $10 per month to subscribe Netflix, then they can enjoy thousands of films from Netflix store every month instead of spending $15 in cinema to watch one movie only. In addition, there is a huge amount of films that are published on Internet free.
Although watching movies on personal devices is affordable, I am still supporting the idea that movies need to be watched in a cinema in order to have best experience about a film. Firstly, cinemas always equip huge screens with high resolution which will bring clear and great quality videos to guests. Secondly, high-end speakers that cinema invested money on also delivers an amazing sound quality to their customers. Finally, people who are crazy with a new film released can enjoy the film immediately in a cinema where is located nearby their house.
In conclusion, this essay discussed both views regarding watching films on personal devices and enjoying movies in cinemas. I am in favor of going to cinemas to fully enjoy the quality of movies.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, however, regarding, second, secondly, so, still, then, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1377.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73195876289 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51108476535 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54295532646 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.218576045 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.3571428571 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32567023535 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114352218437 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592208654293 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207456272852 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0189613726696 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.