Technology has become an inseparable part of our lives. More specifically, mobile phones are a permanent companion that enables us to send e-mails, capture photos, and instantly contact others. One can't overlook the advantages of such new technology, but others fear that the existence of mobile phones is disrupting social interaction. Various psychologists and technology enthusiasts have had debates concerning mobile phones and social interaction. As a result of attending these debates, I believe that social interaction is greatly disrupted.
In one aspect, nowadays, every individual has their eyes and concentration constantly fixated on their mobile phones. One can observe pedestrians occasionally bumping into each other or other inanimate objects while walking. And that doesn't only occur on the streets! In fact many managers have complained and raised the issue of employees spending too much time on their mobile phones instead of serving clients. Therefore, clients sense that they are doing business with robots who can't have a conversation due to the fact that the employee is in another universe.
In another aspect, specifically, in family gathering and holidays were spending time with family is cherished. People would physically be in the same room, however, mentally in different places. Hence, the joy of such gathering is deteriorating and the social interaction becomes in grave danger from being erased. Consequently, cancelling sentiments of gather with family and loved ones.
Finally, mobile phones are an enormous part of our lives, whether we like it or not, however that shouldn't interfere and disrupt other parts such as social interaction. Accordingly one must learn how to live with mobile phones and take control of it, not the other way around.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 199, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...otos, and instantly contact others. One cant overlook the advantages of such new tec...
^^^^
Line 3, column 235, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...animate objects while walking. And that doesnt only occur on the streets! In fact many...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 485, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...they are doing business with robots who cant have a conversation due to the fact tha...
^^^^
Line 7, column 99, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...whether we like it or not, however that shouldnt interfere and disrupt other parts such ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 170, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Accordingly,
...other parts such as social interaction. Accordingly one must learn how to live with mobile ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 251, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...th mobile phones and take control of it, not the other way around.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, consequently, finally, hence, however, if, look, so, therefore, thus, while, in fact, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1517.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49637681159 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89826764922 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626811594203 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2212409672 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.133333333 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.26666666667 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254826104199 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0776724595319 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648657896435 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145868156113 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0844317114145 0.056905535591 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.