Some people think that economic growth is the key to end poverty and hunger, while some believes that progress in an economy can harm the environment. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Economic development seems to be an effective way to eradicate the problems of poverty and hunger in the present world. However, I would argue that environment should not be put into a threat for the purpose of financial growth. This essay will discuss both of these views.
To begin with, developing the economy by establishing the industries will help to encounter the issue of poverty and hunger. More and more industries means, it will create enormous job opportunities for the unemployed people. Not only this but also the government will be able to collect more money as taxes from these companies. So the money can be used to supply food for the people who will be out of work and the basic needs of the poor people could be fulfilled as well.
On the other hand, establishing many industries will obviously increase the problems of environmental issues. Can we avoid this point for the sake of eradicating poverty and hunger? First of all, the exhaust from the industries will obviously pollute the air. In order to build more industries, more and more trees need to be cut down. As a result, the amount of Carbon-di-oxide will be increased which may lead to another major problem- global warming. The chemicals and wastes from these industries will also polluter water and land.
But these environmental problems could be controlled by successful efforts of the government, such as making pollution related norms strict, shutting down only those industries which are generating more pollution. Funds for the research and development programs related to this field should be increased.
In conclusion, although industrial growth is important for the sake of employment opportunities which will help to reduce poverty and hunger, the environmental issues should not be neglected. I believe that if government can take proper steps, the environment will be saved.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 140, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'industries'' or 'industry's'?
Suggestion: industries'; industry's
...ue of poverty and hunger. More and more industries means, it will create enormous job oppo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 477, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...poor people could be fulfilled as well. On the other hand, establishing many ind...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, well, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 7.85571142285 280% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1578.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1568627451 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85777166695 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549019607843 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3486316891 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8235294118 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58823529412 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103278183976 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0417179255023 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435557427984 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0736610540286 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437088394092 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.