Some people think that it is fine for professional sportsmen and sportswomen to misbehave on or off the field, as long as they are playing well. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
The topic of validation of the behavior of sports personality always remained controversial. Strata of the populace reiterate that the misbehavior of the professional sportsmen and sportswomen should not be questioned anywhere until they play well. This essay is in disagreement with the above- said notion.
To begin with, firstly, the sportspersons are well-known people and especially among teenagers. Even some of the players are role models of these teens therefore; they are influenced by every act done by them. In other words, it is observed that people use to follow their mentors and it is obvious that if their mentor will misbehave they will do the same. For instance, Mahinder Singh Dhoni is one of the recognized Indian cricketers if he will use abusive language on the pitch then follower will definitely follow him.
Furthermore, the law is the same for everyone hence, nobody has the right to misbehave neither on the pitch nor off-pitch. Therefore, if any person either a civil citizen or sports personality breaks any law or misbehave, they must be punished in order to show that equality overrules the status. To illustrate, in 2001 the recognized cricketer of Pakistan team was punished for abusing the girl for her clothes in the public which typically shows that law is more important than the status of the personality.
To conclude, sportsmen and sportswomen are also citizens and should not be spare for misbehaving because they are epitome for some citizens, and laws are more important than their status.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 101, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...le and especially among teenagers. Even some of the players are role models of these teens ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 253, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...other words, it is observed that people use to follow their mentors and it is obvio...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, so, then, therefore, well, even so, for instance, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1287.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12749003984 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83244237328 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.601593625498 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2543362959 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8181818182 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3636363636 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239698126304 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0841652260142 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614721363933 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144617153003 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447873672482 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.