Nowadays, people think that job security will bring more benefits than the satisfaction. However, there is a fair amount of people support the idea that it is better to have satisfaction rather than to have a permanent position. In my sentiment, I totally agree with the view related to job satisfaction. This essay is going to discuss both points and argues why I support that argument.
On the one hand, I understand why people agree that having a permanent contract is important because it comes from two reasons. Firstly, individuals need to maintain a stable financial status, for example, a solid financial source will help them to pay numerous bills every month such as mortgages, insurance, or the internet, or power. Additionally, people will gain more reputation of having a permanent work. For example, employers will prefer applicants who work consecutively in one company than candidates who jumped so many companies.
On the other hand, although job security will help employees to maintain financial status and reputation, however, I believe peace of mind is much more important than permanent employment because of two reasons. Firstly, employees will hardly achieve the best performance without comfortable. 80 percent of employees do not meet a deadline because they did not feel comfortable while working, according to the research of Harvard university, Furthermore, employees tend to resign from their stable profession because they feel boring. For example, individuals who work in one role for so many years, usually complete repeated tasks, so they will feel tedious, which will result in resignation. According to the report from Oxford University, 60 percent of employees will resign from the position if they could not make any movement.
In conclusion, while many people prefer having a permanent contract, I do prefer having contentment in the positions, which will help me to produce better value for the employers.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1642.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31391585761 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89814453297 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540453074434 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5766187962 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.285714286 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0714285714 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64285714286 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247640640575 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0981750692071 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10259244821 0.0667982634062 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169622367795 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124712748411 0.056905535591 219% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.