Nowadays, people think that job security will bring more benefits than job satisfaction. However, there is a fair amount of people support the idea that it is better to have satisfaction in a job rather than to have a permanent job. In my sentiment, I totally agree with the view related to job satisfaction. This is essay is going to discuss both points and argues why I support that argument
On the one hand, I agree that having a permanent job is important due to two reasons. Firstly, individuals need to maintain a stable financial status. It is indisputable that there are numerous bills that people need to pay every month such as a mortgage, internet, water, and power. Therefore, the permanent job will guarantee people to pay their bills on time. Secondly, people will gain more reputation from having a permanent job. For example, employers will prefer applicants who work consecutively in one company than candidates who jumped so many companies.
Although job security will help employees to maintain financial status and reputation, however, I believe job satisfaction is much more important than permanent employment because of two reasons. Firstly, employees will hardly achieve the best performance without satisfaction. There is a fact that 80 percent of people do not meet a deadline because they did not feel comfortable while working. Secondly, employees tend to resign from their stable job because they feel boring. Individuals who work in one position for so many years usually complete repeated tasks, so they will feel tedious, which will result in quitting from the position. According to the report from Oxford University, 60 percent of employees will resign from the position if they could not make any movement.
In conclusion, while many people prefer having a permanent job, I do prefer having satisfaction in the positions, which will help me to produce better value for the employers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 394, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s and argues why I support that argument On the one hand, I agree that having a p...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1611.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13057324841 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82816355031 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5232897751 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.6875 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.625 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.410478219881 0.244688304435 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154376534459 0.084324248473 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.149266137447 0.0667982634062 223% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.288620227873 0.151304729494 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134809758191 0.056905535591 237% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.