Some people think that more money should be spent on protecting endangered species while others think that it is a waste of valuable money. What is your opinion?
A notable downfall has occurred in hunting down the endangered species in last few decades. These creatures need to be protected by adopting various ways. In my opinion money need to be spent to protect these species.
It is true that some creatures might be very dangerous and can have a negative impact on humans in terms of casualties. For example deadly reptiles and sea animals like sharks. Some people are extremely against while protecting these creatures. They think that extincts are very important in order to stop the human deaths that occurred due to these creatures. For example, in Africa, which is considering the biggest continent for wildlife, most humans have become victims of these deadly creatures than any other part of the world.
On the other hand, most people show their concern to ensure that their existence should maintain. People are aware that some species are very rare on this planet and their existence are very important. For instance, polar bears or Gorillas considering one of the most dangerous animals but on the same page, they are equally very rare creatures. These creatures can be very dangerous if they attack on them. Therefore, to maintain the inhabitants of these creatures and also for the safety of the humans life, more money need to be spent to ensure that both are safe at their own ends let's say protection act should be enacted for the hunters and safety measures should be initiated against these species to protect the humans from their inevitable attack.
In the end, both lives are important and therefore need to be protected. Like some species are a symbol of their country regardless of being dangerous as Australia has Kangaroos and Sri Lanka has got Elephant signs on their Flags. All species should have equal rights towards their way of living
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 240, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t. For instance, polar bears or Gorillas considering one of the most dangerous an...
^^
Line 5, column 499, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...reatures and also for the safety of the humans life, more money need to be spent to en...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 297, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...equal rights towards their way of living
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in my opinion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1512.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95737704918 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43401497879 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52131147541 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.6292034147 49.4020404114 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0625 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247448752711 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0825016031303 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.069085839059 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15111568575 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488645712954 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.