Few among masses believe that the single reason for being a workaholic is to get high remuneration. People’s perception towards hardworking could resort two important aspects, one as objective and another being necessity. In this essay, I shall emphasis on different views of the people and give my opinion.
On one hand, as we all agree that remuneration is the basic need every individual looks for his survival. For this reason, workers toil to obtain increased reward to fulfill their needs and look after their respective family. Consequently, people tend to believe in earning money working as much as they could. Therefore, there is nothing wrong about the notion earning money working hard. It is in fact, every individual must have such thoughts that working hard only could bring bounties and bonuses.
On the other hand, different aspects reveal that money is not the main reason behind hard working, but interest and satisfaction. To exemplify this, “The ministry of labor” and “Union for work and ethics committee” researched and observed the individual workers and come up with the statistical data showing reason behind their dedication. Subsequently, it was reported that workers with job satisfaction were found dedicated in contrast to workers with money being criteria.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that earning a livelihood does not necessarily result in working hard however, job satisfaction and interest does account that. From the future perspective, it is a better policy for human resource personnel to recruit staff according to the interest of an individual.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 302, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rding to the interest of an individual.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, look, so, therefore, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, in contrast to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1377.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46428571429 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93211544067 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.623015873016 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2672013378 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.923076923 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3846153846 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46153846154 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208206526026 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0750597215353 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573627096575 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11149020354 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508272112133 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.