Tougher laws are considered by many as the best way to curb noise pollution and restrict its disturbing effect on people. On the other side, some people believe that such laws are an infringement of freedom of speech and can never really achieve the desired outcome. This essay will discuss both views.
Strict laws would imply fear of creating a noise pollution and in-turn this could have positive effects on society. Firstly, it would be helpful in tackling public nuisance. Nowadays, people turn a blind eye to there sorrrounding and often talk in loud decibels which affects other people. For instance, in public transport many youngsters tend to form group and talk / laugh loudly and use swearing words which affects other co-travellers and their spring offs. In addition, stricter laws would also come in handy where silence is of utmost importance, such as in a library or hospitals, and thus will be helpful for the society.
On the other hand, people believe that speech is most used form of communcation and thus it would not be possible to curb the same by any laws. Firstly such laws are not considered as practical by many as speech is what makes this sociery and any curb on t in he sme will resulttherre opinion, up portive arguments for this. For instance, defining rules for emerrgency cases is not possible as to when a person can speak loudly and when not. Moreover, this law can also be misused as people would not be able to prove their innocense due to lack of evidance.
To conclude, rise in disturbance cases caused by noise from human beings is a cause of concern for society and people need to understand importance of following public etiquette such as talking slowly. Clearly, these manners are long forgotton and public nuisance has become a major problem. Strict laws are considered by many as s good solution for these problems, however other section believes any such law is a violation of freedom.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 13, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...due to lack of evidance. To conclude, rise in disturbance cases caused by nois...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, moreover, really, so, thus, as to, for instance, in addition, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85843373494 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53510731754 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55421686747 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4042496639 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.533333333 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1333333333 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.93333333333 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192685284697 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0654085912236 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434463314088 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125662700304 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0281373407942 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.