Some people view giving presents as an important way to show care to family and friends. Others think there are more important things that can be done to show care and appreciation.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Exchanging presents has been a longtime tradition embedded within human history. Although some believe that there are other methods to replace such practice, it is perceivable that giving gifts is still the most influential way to show one's love and care. This statement will be analysed in the following paragraphs, supported by relevant examples.
Tangible presents can exist eternally and this thus can remind the giver of the gift for a long time. Although actions taken such as sharing meaningful words can be emotionally effective, they are expected to be evanescent as time elapses. Presents, however, can leave one with a solid memory of a particular person and his thoughts. In fact, as is the case with many loyal families' custom, they focus on sending out presents to their loved ones more than doing anything else so that their affinity can be remembered for generations.
Practicality is another distinctive aspect that presents can offer. For example, my grandmother has been suffering from muscular pain for a long time. Although she would appreciate our effort to spend time with her to express our affection, giving her a massage machine could be more efficient. The present would not only show our care but also offer a solution to her lifetime health problem. Hence, it can be demonstrated that presents intensify one's sense of affinity by fulfilling dual purposes; showing one's love and giving what the person is in need of. This then clearly substantiate that gifts contain more meaningful terms than sharing endearment.
In conclusion, the aforementioned ideas evidently encapsulate the two reasons explaining how tangible presents can the most effective way to display someone's love.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 449, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...be demonstrated that presents intensify ones sense of affinity by fulfilling dual pu...
^^^^
Line 5, column 658, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aningful terms than sharing endearment. In conclusion, the aforementioned ideas ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, still, then, thus, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1442.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26277372263 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79131951757 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631386861314 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2038174652 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5714285714 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213842069337 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0696509415986 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052449112374 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126136984211 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0458373733376 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.