Space exploration requires vast sums of money. Is the amount of money spent on space research justifiable? Could the money be better spent?
There has always been considerable debate about whether governments in many countries should spend money on space research. In my view, it is impossible to justify the amount of money invested in space research. The principal reason is that there are many projects should be in higher priority in this decade.
Firstly, there are still many people living in poor condition especially in underdeveloped countries. They are suffering the lack of food as well as clean water. Instead of spending money on space research, the developed countries should execute programs to improve the life quality of citizens in underdeveloped countries. For example, the US government spent about $100 million dollars on researches regarding space and planets in 2014. If the equal money invested to build systems to process water sources in Sudan, all citizens this country would have had clean water in daily life.
Secondly, there are many urgent problems that nations have to resolve as soon as possible, such as air pollution and HIV. Most residences of countries are breathing in the polluted atmosphere which contains the huge quantity of Hg. People may slip into a coma and die if they breathe in a certain amount of this substance. Moreover, if the governments had reduced budget to projects of NASA and had spent more money on HIV research, the HIV patients could have been treated better.
In conclusion, it is hard to justify the budget spent on space research due to there are many serious issues need to be addressed. Support to poor countries, invest more money to find out cures for HIV and air pollution are the urgent programs that countries should set a high priority on.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, still, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1402.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02508960573 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64563234628 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541218637993 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0473061965 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.846153846 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4615384615 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7692307692 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317791598901 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115260437877 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107889756469 0.0667982634062 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205323342856 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0603834618379 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.