Television has had a significant influence on the culture of many societies. To what extent would you say that television has positively or negatively affected the cultural development of your society?
Actually, television has had considerable impacts to people’s habits. In this essay, I will figure out some of its negativisms and positivisms to the cultural development.
There are several reasons why television brings on the disastrous impact on cultural development. Nowadays, television has many programmes to satisfy people’s entertainment. Almost all channels bring the game shows with a desire to entertain people. Citizens actually hardly learn anything from it. In addition, many people get addicted to that vain shows, as well as spend too much time for watching TV. They no longer take part in other outdoor and traditional activities. This will make them become unfamiliar to traditional hobbies such as dancing or festivals.
On the other hand, looking at the positive aspect of this issue, we can observe that television is also a source of information. By watching informative channels, people can enhance their knowledge. We can learn a new language by watching a particular language channel. Housewives can improve their knowledge about cooking from TV cooking shows. Moreover, the image country can be promoted over TV channels with introductive content like movies, gameshow and live event. People just need stay at home and watch TV to know more about the traditional festivals, attractive places of other cultures.
All in all, everything has its own advantages and disadvantages. It totally depends on an individual to decide what to learn from something. Television provides much information that significantly improve our knowledge. The time allocated and the selected programmes should be carefully controlled. Parents must be cautious and take more control their children’s TV schedule.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, if, look, moreover, so, well, in addition, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56818181818 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1246946591 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.655303030303 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.0952601311 49.4020404114 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 73.5 106.682146367 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.2 20.7667163134 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121847983371 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0373884565706 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0536210742451 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0841759120384 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407695412119 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.82 50.2224549098 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.14 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.