In today’s society, more and more work is done by machines. Do you think the positive effects of the development overweigh the negative effects on individuals and society?
It is undoubtable that machineries have taken a permanant holding in current era to do fast production. I think, these inventions have both pros and cons, but they definitely have more optimistic effects than pessimistic effects on people and community.
The advantages of this creation are numerous to mention. Firstly, rate of consumption is being increased day by day, so machines are crucial key to unlock production demands. Secondly, machines make not only humans’ life easy but also fast. For example, before machinery invention, it took several months to build home, however 3D printer builds home within a week with affordable cost. Moreover, machines bring industrial revolution in every sector of industry, because of this trend many people get employment. For example, manufacturing sector gives millions of jobs every year around the world. Last but not the least, machine makes Information technology sector more flexible than ever before. A great example of this, in situation of Covid-19 pandemic works of IT industries are being done from home to control spreading of corona virus.
On the downside, due to excessive use of robotics technology in manufacturing industry, many people lose their full-time job status. For instance, two decades ago, around two million people were employed in automotive sector in North American region. Despite of increasing demand of automotive vehicles over a decade, rate of employment has been decreased because of automation and mechatronics. Not only this, air pollution is also caused by industrial gases and fossil fuels.
In conclusion, machine has limited draw backs, but it brings infinite benefits for mankind over a time.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1433.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44866920152 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83438590174 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.67680608365 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.6306750803 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.5333333333 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5333333333 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.06666666667 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113724834613 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0325174235882 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483743183396 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0666407655442 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0603186737234 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.