The world is consuming resources at an increasing rate. In order to prevent these resources from being wasted, governments should try to discourage people from constantly throwing away items and buying the newest and most up-to-date products.
To what extent do you agree?
Over-consumption of resources is the biggest concern these days. People are being pushed to utilize the products that they already have and refrain using the new one. However, I partially agree that people should be discouraged of using the latest products because some updated technologies are used to save the energy resources in a large extent.
To begin with, people are extremely following the clothing trends. Especially, increasing fashions in women society emphasizing them to buy the most latest fashion clothes and discard their recent collections. This trend is badly affecting the environment. For example, in winter, women prefer to wear woolen clothes and some wear clothes made up of animal skins. This practice not only allow them to waste the useful items every year but also damaging the natural environment and their habitats.
In contrast of the above statement, some latest products are now introducing to reduce the consumption level of energy resources. For example laptops and other machines that have multiple features are now available. Taking the viewpoint of laptops, in the past, people used to operate heavier desktop systems which required more electricity but these small gadgets making environment much safer by utilizing minimum amount of such energy. In addition to that, multinational companies are now using machines that have various functions such as photo copier, fax and printing options. This trend demotivate practice of using multiple machines that make environment more worse.
In my opinion, government need to analyze various factors under consideration before applying any policies on consumption of resources because if some products have negative consequences on society then some have positive effects that saves the environment profusely.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 104, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... People are being pushed to utilize the products that they already have and refr...
^^
Line 1, column 249, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hould be discouraged of using the latest products because some updated technologi...
^^
Line 3, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ces in a large extent. To begin with, people are extremely following the cloth...
^^
Line 3, column 103, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ends. Especially, increasing fashions in women society emphasizing them to buy t...
^^
Line 3, column 110, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...specially, increasing fashions in women society emphasizing them to buy the most...
^^
Line 3, column 148, Rule ID: MOST_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'latest' (without 'most') when you use the superlative.
Suggestion: latest
...en society emphasizing them to buy the most latest fashion clothes and discard their recen...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 148, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'most the latest'.
Suggestion: most the latest
...en society emphasizing them to buy the most latest fashion clothes and discard their recen...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 4, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
... environment and their habitats. In contrast of the above statement, some latest pro...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 664, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'worse' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: worse
...multiple machines that make environment more worse. In my opinion, government need to a...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, for example, in addition, in contrast, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1526.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56934306569 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76600925198 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620437956204 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.9826930822 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5714285714 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103701920933 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0350582718832 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0375917576324 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0660448773891 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477618012061 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.