World history suggests that violence and conflict were more evident under male leadership than under female leadership. So, for peace to prevail, female leadership can be considered as a better option than male leadership.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The human history reveals that there were both male and female rulers who were involved in various wars. So peace being disturbed is not the liability of men only and I am of the opinion that the power shift, from men to women, is destined to be futile in prevailing peace.
Most of the women who are considered as great till date, e.g. Queen Isabella of Spain, Queen Mary, Victoria and Elizabeth of Britain, all of them ruled the world over a vast spectrum of power. They have done so ruthlessly to achieve their target. These women are not the anomalies of the history, but the examples from numerous others, who went beyond the boundaries of gender in the path of prevailing in power while expanding peace whenever they deemed it to be expandable.
The two greatest wars of modern history, World War I & II, have taught us that wars are impersonal. Race, religion, nationality, gender are only pretences to the universally human lust for power. Though it is true that during both the global conflicts men were in the rulers’ throne, it will be foolish to say that Margaret Thatcher, the famed Iron Lady, who spared no road against a minnow enemy in the war of Finland, would be more diplomatic than how the greats Winston Churchill and Franklyn D. Roosevelt had been tackling the axis of Hitler.
In conclusion, the gender issue is only a dominant in the battlefield of gender, not the battles among nations and people. It is, therefore, impertinent to say that the world conflicts are the outcome of particular gender and the finer sex would do a better job at prevailing peace if selectively put at the helm of human nations.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, e.g., frankly, if, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1359.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73519163763 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5533632467 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592334494774 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.5997432186 49.4020404114 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.545454545 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0909090909 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.45454545455 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145377755843 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0476558302049 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430776085304 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0866365448395 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403644576809 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.