1 2 3

Essay topics:

1 2 3

Since the dawn of civilization, people have alwayes been trying to make the best decision for themselves and their societies. It is important to mention that almost during all the documented history the process of decision making remained with no noteworthy change. However, one of the most important milestones of recent decades is changes that had accured in the process of dicision making and peoples' perspective in this regard. A controversial question which is often raised regarding these changes is about the advantages and dis advantages old way and new one.
Some people are inclined toward this opinion that it is better ti work slowly and make sure that everything is perfect, so they perefer the old way. On the other hand,others look at this debate through different lens and think that it is better to take a riske and make quick decision. Personaly, I am more in agreement with those who perefer the quick process of decision making. In the following parageraph, three conspicuous reasons will cogently substantiate my perspective.
The first noteworthy point regarding the issue is the high-speed tempo of life in today's world. World has changed, and thanks to unbelivable technological dvances, something that in past take one year now can be done in just few days. Because of this shift in daily life i am with this opinion that it is better to be consistance with life speed, and male speedy decisions. For instance, imagin that you are face with the question of wheter accepet an offer for a job in another city or not. in the past you defenitly had enough time to spend it on different aspects of this offer, but now you hanv not this opption. If you waist too much time to study the offer, thet will witdraw this offer and you will lose your chance.
Another reasons which deserve some words here is the higly competitive atmosphere of todays life. You must remember that todays the number of people who have similar condition and skills and ability, is much more than past. if in the last century the number of people who could have done something especial was fore example 100, now this number is maybe mre than 1 milion. Therefore, you can see that practically you do not have the time for long ponder, because somebody eles is waiting to snatch away your opportunity. Mu brother is an skilled worker in welding, and I remmeber that a bout two years ago he recived a job offer in this field. He spent a lot of time to study this offer and to compar its merits. However, when he decided to accept the offer, the employee answered that because of his delay another skilled worker was assigned to this job, and he had lost his chance.
Finally, in addition to what was mentioned above, as recent studies have revealed, the percentage of people who had succeded with the use of risk-taking technique is much higher than others thecniques, in cluding spending a lot of time to investigate the situations. In fact, an study which was conducted in the USA on more than one thusend succesfull CEO, revealed that roughly 80 percent of these people make their trade-related decision in the first day after they are faced with the challenge. Moreover, the result of the same study revealed that although the risk of this thechnique is high, the value of its possible outcome is far more, and it is completly logical to take this risk.
To make a long story short, all the afforementioned reasons lead me to the conclusion that in today's world, it is better to accepet the risk and make the dicision with much more speed. However, that was a story in a nutshell; actually, there are some reasons and examples, challenging the claim, which are not mentioned above. Hence, it is suggested that a servey be conducted to find out the exact factors involved in this debate.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 167, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , others
...y perefer the old way. On the other hand,others look at this debate through different l...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 271, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ys. Because of this shift in daily life i am with this opinion that it is better ...
^
Line 3, column 394, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e speedy decisions. For instance, imagin that you are face with the question of w...
^^
Line 3, column 493, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...offer for a job in another city or not. in the past you defenitly had enough time ...
^^
Line 4, column 225, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...ls and ability, is much more than past. if in the last century the number of peopl...
^^
Line 4, column 536, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ch away your opportunity. Mu brother is an skilled worker in welding, and I remmeb...
^^
Line 5, column 276, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...to investigate the situations. In fact, an study which was conducted in the USA on...
^^

Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'but', 'finally', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'moreover', 'regarding', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'as for', 'for instance', 'in addition', 'in fact', 'on the other hand']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.233425414365 0.229887763892 102% => OK
Verbs: 0.160220994475 0.158761421928 101% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0773480662983 0.0866891130778 89% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0552486187845 0.046263068375 119% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0483425414365 0.0685040099705 71% => OK
Prepositions: 0.127071823204 0.118717715034 107% => OK
Participles: 0.0372928176796 0.0351676179071 106% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.57201579146 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0262430939227 0.0309702414327 85% => OK
Particles: 0.00276243093923 0.00188951952338 146% => OK
Determiners: 0.113259668508 0.0887237588012 128% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00966850828729 0.0209618222197 46% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0151933701657 0.0139019557991 109% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3787.0 2387.08602151 159% => OK
No of words: 659.0 408.028673835 162% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.74658573596 5.86048508987 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.06665523852 4.48200974243 113% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.326251896813 0.338922669872 96% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.241274658574 0.251872472559 96% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.154779969651 0.174417080927 89% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.100151745068 0.112833075102 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57201579146 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 322.0 212.727598566 151% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488619119879 0.524397521467 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 62.014702027 59.2087087015 105% => OK
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6684587814 131% => OK
Sentence length: 24.4074074074 20.5533526081 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8117474189 48.84282405 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.259259259 120.699889404 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4074074074 20.5533526081 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.703703703704 0.644075263715 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.5376344086 132% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.54480286738 126% => OK
Readability: 48.5348732648 45.7405998639 106% => OK
Elegance: 1.50785340314 1.45489161554 104% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.300154397459 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.124123641002 0.103427244359 120% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0719318500631 0.0752933317313 96% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.520857513639 0.497263757937 105% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.122253767999 0.151897553556 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.114077575197 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0781384742642 0% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.429856359261 0.336927656856 128% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0544886293983 0.067059652881 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.210909579961 0% => The content is off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0618886996521 0% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8870967742 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.86379928315 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.91756272401 163% => OK
Positive topic words: 16.0 8.42114695341 190% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.4623655914 122% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 2.75985663082 217% => OK
Total topic words: 25.0 13.6433691756 183% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.