agree/disagree? It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends.
We all go thorough challenging times in our lives when we need to lean on our friends for love and assistance. We could have a long-life friend to share our enjoyments or we could make new relationships to share our time with. However, I agree with the opinion that it is essential to continue our interactions with old friends rather than making new friends.
First, long-lasting friends can intuitively understand each other. Awareness which comes from many years of friendship enables them to know their values and outlook for life. Therefore they could provide a friend with assistance. For instance a friend who can identify with a companion’s problems and life struggles could offer beneficial advices compared to the ones who are not familiar with the deep feelings of their pals. Furthermore, by deeply knowing each other, old friends could make their friends happier. The people, who have been closet from childhood, know just the words to cheer up their associates. “Old friends who keep on sharing their time, whose quality of life are approximately 30% higher than those who lost their long-life friends.” ( New York Times), simply remind us why it is worthwhile to keep our old friends.
Secondly, firm friends are trustworthy. Old friends passed their exams very well, therefore we could rely on them easily and tell them our secrets or sincere believes without worrying about its consequences. Nowadays having reliable friends is like owning jewelry. For example when I am really frustrated from work, life and even my family, talking with my old friend makes me relaxes. It is not possible to have these kinds of interactions with new friends because it is really hard to tell your high personal information with the ones who their reliability have not proved yet. In fact It may take many years to reach to this level of confidence.
To sum up, we need to have new friends because of possibility of losing our old friends or needing to grow our social network; however, I agree with the statements of keeping you old friends rather than making new ones because I need companions to understand me whom can cheer me up and be trustworthy.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
makes me relaxes
makes me relaxing
with the ones who their reliability have not proved yet.
with the ones whom their reliability have not proved yet.
to understand me whom can cheer me up and be trustworthy.
to understand me whom they can cheer me up and be trustworthy.
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 23 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 364 350
No. of Characters: 1748 1500
No. of Different Words: 197 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.368 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.802 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.576 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 116 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 91 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 51 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 36 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.222 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 11.636 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.611 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.349 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.491 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.126 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...riends rather than making new friends. First, long-lasting friends can intuitiv...
^^^^
Line 3, column 176, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...know their values and outlook for life. Therefore they could provide a friend with assist...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 772, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... who lost their long-life friends.' New York Times, simply remind us why it ...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s worthwhile to keep our old friends. Secondly, firm friends are trustworthy. ...
^^^
Line 5, column 159, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'beliefs' (noun) instead of believes (verb)?
Suggestion: beliefs
...ly and tell them our secrets or sincere believes without worrying about its consequences...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 304, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hom can cheer me up and be trustworthy.
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'really', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'therefore', 'well', 'while', 'for example', 'for instance', 'in fact', 'to sum up']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.213759213759 0.229887763892 93% => OK
Verbs: 0.167076167076 0.158761421928 105% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0810810810811 0.0866891130778 94% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0540540540541 0.046263068375 117% => OK
Pronouns: 0.110565110565 0.0685040099705 161% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.108108108108 0.118717715034 91% => OK
Participles: 0.041769041769 0.0351676179071 119% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.74752059134 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.039312039312 0.0309702414327 127% => OK
Particles: 0.00737100737101 0.00188951952338 390% => OK
Determiners: 0.041769041769 0.0887237588012 47% => Some determiners wanted.
Modal_auxiliary: 0.02457002457 0.0209618222197 117% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.029484029484 0.0139019557991 212% => Maybe 'Which' is overused. If other WH_determiners like 'Who, What, Whom, Whose...' are used too in sentences, then there are no issues.
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2180.0 2387.08602151 91% => OK
No of words: 364.0 408.028673835 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.98901098901 5.86048508987 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.48200974243 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.332417582418 0.338922669872 98% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.258241758242 0.251872472559 103% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.167582417582 0.174417080927 96% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.107142857143 0.112833075102 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74752059134 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535714285714 0.524397521467 102% => OK
Word variations: 58.6168147972 59.2087087015 99% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6684587814 82% => OK
Sentence length: 21.4117647059 20.5533526081 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.819193086 48.84282405 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.235294118 120.699889404 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4117647059 20.5533526081 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.644075263715 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.54480286738 108% => OK
Readability: 47.2359405301 45.7405998639 103% => OK
Elegance: 1.0962962963 1.45489161554 75% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.39930853162 0.300154397459 133% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.075554760653 0.103427244359 73% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0660698516623 0.0752933317313 88% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.456418615733 0.497263757937 92% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.203741136699 0.151897553556 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141916832119 0.114077575197 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116175467942 0.0781384742642 149% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.337957636721 0.336927656856 100% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0385441920552 0.067059652881 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.285088706082 0.210909579961 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0319493921143 0.0618886996521 52% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8870967742 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.86379928315 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.91756272401 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 16.0 8.42114695341 190% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 2.4623655914 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.75985663082 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 16.0 13.6433691756 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.