In areas where there are many restaurants, some people prefer to buy their meals in restaurants very frequently, rather than cooking and eating meals at home. Other people prefer to cook most of their meals at home and only rarely eat in a restaurant. Which one would you choose and why?
In recent decades, the number of people who eat some meals in restaurants has been exponentially escalated. Although numerous scientists and organizations recommend consuming foods prepared at home, human beings most often ignore this suggestion. It is a controversial issue and some questions are posed in regard to whether people should cook their meals at home or not. A plethora of people prefer to make almost all foods by themselves, but I, to a great extent, take the opposing point of view since buying food from restaurants provides individuals more advantages. The most conspicuous reasons are substantiated in the following paragraphs.
To commence with, the first exquisite point to be mentioned is that cooking food is indeed time-consuming. Although at first blush, it seems that it costs a lot to eat many meals in restaurants, it is not completely true, on the grounds that we save a lot of time, and we would be able to spend more hours with our family members. Therefore, it is worth it to pay some extra money in order to have much time spending talking with our parents or children, especially in the hectic life that individuals are busy with their jobs, family, and so forth. To clarify, consider a mother working in a company and has two children. Spending some hours at night preparing the dinner, she feels exhausted, and she most probably cannot spend much time with her children after dinner. As a result, the more food you cook at home, the less time you have to be in circle of family members.
Beyond a shadow of a doubt, preparing a wide variety of foods in modern restaurants and stores can be regarded as the most merit of new developments. As a matter of fact, people possess the chance to select various food which are present in different stores at any time they want. But this option is implausible if ones want to make food at their home. For instance, a large proportion of businesses in Tehran are related to prepared foods, and it is really convenient to have access to distinct kinds of food. On the other hand, a person cannot make all food instantly since they needs different ingredients which some of them may be unreachable.
To sum up, considering the aforementioned arguments, we may draw the conclusion that eating meals in restaurants brings about some positive consequences in comparison to cooking food at home. Not only does preparing food contribute to spending more time with family, but it also gives people the opportunity to have access to various food which is roughly impossible when they want to prepare it at home. Overall, we cannot turn a blind eye to the fact that we should care about the quality of food provided in restaurants.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 583, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'need'
Suggestion: need
...nnot make all food instantly since they needs different ingredients which some of the...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 525, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uality of food provided in restaurants.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, really, so, therefore, for instance, as a matter of fact, as a result, in regard to, to sum up, on the other hand, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 52.1666666667 148% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2244.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 464.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83620689655 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64119157421 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7933661807 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519396551724 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 692.1 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4081704566 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.105263158 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4210526316 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.36842105263 5.45110844103 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28436219609 0.236089414692 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0935546286019 0.076458572812 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0863323701325 0.0737576698707 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194008544753 0.150856017488 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0927329531037 0.0645574589148 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.