The best way to increase the education quality in the country is to increase teachers’ salary.
Throughout the history, high-quality of the educational system has been a good indicator of development in any given country. Due to its paramount importance, efforts for its adjustments or improvements have been amongst the top priorities of the countries. So the controversial question is which factor plays the most crucial role in this regard? A plethora of people is in the conviction that good salary can be an effective stimulus for lecturers to enhance their teaching method. Contrary to this popular belief, there are those who argue that training the teachers in order to keep up-to-date both their knowledge and teaching methods can have better result. I am of the opinion that both of the mentioned views have their own merits and drawbacks, and the following explanation will further elaborate on this perspective.
First and foremost, the nature of the human has been established based on the motivation. Undoubtedly, each person has particular goal for every single step that is being taken; therefore, one of the most effective ways to encourage people to pursue the determined targets is setting appropriate motivation for them. Money is accounted as the useful tool for the overwhelming majority of people to conduct specific actions, and the teachers are not exception in this list. If the tutors do not earn sufficient income they do not think beyond their duties. In fact, they become reluctant to improve the quality of their jobs, so after a while we encounter with the juveniles who just waste their time in school without gaining any added-value . Consequently, earn raises and high salary are the fundamental means for urging the teachers pay enough attention to the class their fellow students.
Another vital fact that should be taken into consideration is that teaching to the children is not an acceptable element for recognizing the educational system as a high-quality organization. Indeed, there are some factors that have prominent impact on the level of the educational system. Obviously, the knowledge of the teachers is the primary factor. Accurate and up-to-date information of the lecturers can distinguish the children from their counterparts. Furthermore, being aware of diverse approaches for teaching and selecting the most suitable one is another essential element that can incredibly increase the quality of the educational system. Assume the role of a knowledgeable teacher who does have the ability to utilize a proper method in order to convey the material to the students.
On the basis of the point mentioned above, I am convinced that neither the good salary nor the knowledge and awareness of the teachers are solely sufficient for creating a high-quality education system. Subsequently, authorities should gather a lot of elements to provide suitable atmosphere for equipping the current generation with necessary tools to be prepared to enter into the real society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 473, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...eachers are not exception in this list. If the tutors do not earn sufficient incom...
^^
Line 2, column 741, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...n school without gaining any added-value . Consequently, earn raises and high sala...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, while, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2462.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 464.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30603448276 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64119157421 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97672475656 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534482758621 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 777.6 618.680645161 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4304688508 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.1 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.35 5.45110844103 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125772076267 0.236089414692 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0373097908495 0.076458572812 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419386161179 0.0737576698707 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0792892197512 0.150856017488 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424768431378 0.0645574589148 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 11.7677419355 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 58.1214874552 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 86.8835125448 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.