To day's world, it is important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct
In the last three decades, the world has changed drastically. Having said that, nowadays some companies push their employees to finish work quickly and risk making mistakes. From a personal perspective, it is better to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct given that relax working could enhance safety, thinking rationally and productivity.
The first and foremost point, doing mistakes in some critical jobs are very harmful and sometimes could not be fixed. A vivid example of that is pharmacists and physicians should work slowly to make sure that everything is correct given that patient safety is the number one priority. Provided that they are relaxed in their work, they could provide a strong health care system. Consequently, slowly working is essential to ensure safety.
Next, coupled with safety, thinking rationally is another benefit of slowly working. For instance, employees in management departments who are relaxed in their work could get a chance to analyze and organize relevant information, such as facts opinions, judgments and data; moreover, they could make mistakes less often. To put it in other words, employees who work slowly could have time to gain a profounded understanding of many aspects, which helps them to make optimal decisions. Therefore, rational thinking is integral to improve guidance based on facts.
Ultimately, even though employees who work hard could finish their work faster, they are less effective. However, stress-free employees are more productive. For example, software and hardware engineers who are relaxed in their work could come up with new designs and create new projects, which boost companies' economic success. As a result, working slowly is significant to promote productivity.
Taking everything into consideration, without a doubt, slowly working could not only enhance employees' mental well-being, but also foster companies' financial success. It is suggested that companies design new programs that help their employees to do their roles without stress and improve their work-capacity.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 52.1666666667 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1759.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 317.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54889589905 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78187654051 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570977917981 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5695519189 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.470588235 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6470588235 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.17647058824 5.45110844103 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330021075685 0.236089414692 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114079199961 0.076458572812 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0933738425551 0.0737576698707 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211331435541 0.150856017488 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104637832635 0.0645574589148 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 10.9000537634 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.