Do you agree or disagree Although technology had made communication easier there are still as many misunderstandings among people as there were in the past
There is no doubt that technology has facilitated communication. We can now send text messages and recordings in a fraction of seconds. With the advancement of technology live video calls are also feasible. While this has helped us communicate effectively, it has left room for misunderstandings that are inevitable since there is little to no face to face interaction.
When typing messages instead of communicating them verbally, things such as tone and clarity may not be detected by the writer. Too short a message may seem abrupt and rude, while a long one may cause confusion to the reader. Another example of miscommunication is when someone accidentally types in all caps, giving the impression that they are angry. Misinterpretations such as these can quickly escalate into quarrels and enmity if not handled properly.
Most messaging apps allow us to see if a person received and viewed our message. If the receiver does not reply because they are too busy or the message was marked as read because the app was open, the sender may feel as if they are deliberately being ignored, causing spats amongst people. Another frustrating aspect is the autocorrect feature. Users might send inappropriate or provoking words accidentally, and although they can correct it, if the sender is oblivious of their mistake, the receiver may be hurt or offended.
All in all, while technology has eased communication over long distances, it has the drawback of creating misunderstandings. Miscommunication is still common as they were before the advent of technology, though the nature and cause of these misunderstandings are quite different.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, second, so, still, while, as to, no doubt, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 52.1666666667 40% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1387.0 1977.66487455 70% => OK
No of words: 263.0 407.700716846 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27376425856 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.48103885553 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32067841208 2.67179642975 124% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.623574144487 0.524837075471 119% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 618.680645161 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6655990739 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0714285714 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7857142857 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64285714286 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0841919189239 0.236089414692 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0285018033688 0.076458572812 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0332061765388 0.0737576698707 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0591800195812 0.150856017488 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.048229192458 0.0645574589148 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.