Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Children should spend most of their time on studying and playing, and they shouldn’t be required to help a family with household chores, such as cleaning and cooking.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Children should spend most of their time on studying and playing, and they shouldn’t be required to help a family with household chores, such as cleaning and cooking.

Children are the most important part of each society. In my opinion, the benefits of helping the family with household clearly outweigh spending more time on studying and playing. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following paragraphs.

To begin with, being responsible is the most valuable as well as fundamental part of children's upbringing. In fact, when they take responsibility for something, they learn how to manage their duties, and I am certain that they will not have any difficulties in their lives based on their experience. In addition, they are able to learn some precious skills, which help them to experience better life when they live alone. An example will illustrate this viewpoint much better. When I was a child, I always helped my mother in cooking; therefore, I learned to cook many foods. Hence, I did not have any problems to cook food when I studied at the university abroad, which was far from my family. As a result of being responsible for my childhood, I could experience self-reliant and independent life without any problems. For this reason, children who help their family in their childhood will be successful in their future lives because of having important personal skills.

Secondly, ability to handle some duties with family members prepare children better for their future. Since they are supposed to attend the society in the near future, it boosts their cooperative feature which enables them to interact others easily. In fact, they have a better performance when they are a member of a group. For example, when I was an undergraduate student, I had a part-time job at university campus magazine as a reporter. As I remember, one time, I interviewed professor Nejati, who is a well-known psychologist in my country, about the effects of being helpful on students' performance. He told me that students coming to university with the valuable experience from their childhood, are the ones potential enough to being a leader a group project. As a result, he recommended that all parents use their children in the household in order to promote their abilities to manage their issues well.
In conclusion, no one can deny the enormous positive effects of participation of children in the household. Not only are they able to increase their personal skills, but also they can collaborate with others easily and increase their productivity.

Votes
Average: 7.2 (4 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 586, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
..., about the effects of being helpful on students performance. He told me that students c...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, i feel, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2019.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 400.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0475 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86222706122 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 630.9 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.2560278534 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.95 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 5.45110844103 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274765424559 0.236089414692 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0867982318052 0.076458572812 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652738037759 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186761168628 0.150856017488 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.037022685593 0.0645574589148 57% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.