Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The food we ate in
the past was healthier than the food we eat today.
Which one of the following would you change to improve your health:
1. The kind of food you eat 2. The amount of exercise 3. The amount of stress
Human being usually has some negative and bad habits that influence on their life with some complex and inappropriate side effects. Actually, people with those negative characteristics ruin their life, even their health; for example, type of foods, laziness, life without sport, life with high level of tension, etc. are some sample bad habits that would be dangerous for people’s health. Some people if asked would agree with the statement that eating foods or playing sports or living without stress are equally important for a healthy life, while others would mention it is depends on a great deal of factors, like age. As far as I am concerned, I adopt a firm position that stress is the most perilous enemy of humans’ life, particularly for people who live in modern cities. In what follows I will cogently pinpoint some conspicuous reasons.
First of all, it is important to consider that stress have the most negative effect on humans’ life. Particularly, in modern societies, people usually are involved with concerns, which are accompanied with tensions and stress. It is obvious that the rates of death in new era with higher level of stress if much more than the past. As a matter of fact, stress if far harmful rather than bad nurture and life without exercise. Therefore, I believe people must reduce the level of stress in their life to improve their health and quality of life. By way of example, I can recall when I was student in college; I was very stressful for studies and exams as if I was not able to breathe normally owing to stress. After a while, when I listened to my parents’ counsels bout adverse influences of stress and advantages of life without stress, I discarded stress and felt I could breathe better than the past.
Another equally significant point to be mentioned is that if someone changes their kind of food they eat or the amount of exercise but have high amount of stress, they will not be successful to alter their life and level of health, because they are dealing with thoughts and ideas that make stress and they are not able to focus on their aim and unpleasant effects of stress certainly divert main goal, which is getting better of health. For example, three years ago, my sister was going to change her diet and decrease her weight. After a couple of weeks, she grasped that she had stomach pain and thought diet alteration is reason of that pain, but after a little while she understood that stress ensued from house project was main reasons that had negative impact on diet change program.
By way of conclusion, based on the arguments explored above, I am of the opinion that in most cases stress is main reason of having unhealthy life. Not only have bad effect on humans’ physical health but also have negative impact on spiritual health of them. Consequently, it is highly suggested that media and television authorities put more emphasis on programs and advertisements as to how people could improve their health through reducing of the amount of stress.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 914, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t I could breathe better than the past. Another equally significant point to be ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 574, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fter a couple of weeks, she grasped that she had stomach pain and thought diet al...
^^
Line 5, column 793, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...negative impact on diet change program. By way of conclusion, based on the argum...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, first, if, so, therefore, while, as to, for example, kind of, as a matter of fact, first of all, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 76.0 52.1666666667 146% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2527.0 1977.66487455 128% => OK
No of words: 520.0 407.700716846 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85961538462 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77530192783 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56571543825 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490384615385 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 765.9 618.680645161 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 83.765700145 48.9658058833 171% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.0 100.406767564 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3684210526 20.6045352989 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.63157894737 5.45110844103 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 3.85842293907 363% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125380291789 0.236089414692 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.042317494276 0.076458572812 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0370678347062 0.0737576698707 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0794751756217 0.150856017488 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0255767562918 0.0645574589148 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 11.7677419355 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.1575268817 124% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 86.8835125448 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.