Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The food we eat today is much healthier than in the past.
Maintaining health is the culmination of sundry facets including medical care, living contexts and so forth. Throughout the history, people have made efforts in order to lead a healthy life or restore their health. Various points of view which are germane to the matter being discussed brings us to the moot question as to whether foods in the past prevent people from leading a healthy life than today. However, the popular sentiment to which I vehemently cling is that with the technological advancement and improvements of hygienic condition of foods, the food we eat today is by far healthy and it jeopardizes our well-being. The underlying aim of this essay is to put forward some cogent reasons to shed light on a number of issues in this framework.
To commence with, contrast the lives we are leading to those of our ancestors, the complete way of living has undergone a transformation. Not only our eating habit but also our daily routines, aspirations, expectations are changing at a very swift pace. Generally phrased, people in the past were more careful about the foods and they always tried to rely on healthy foods. As a palpable example, in today's hectic city of life, vast majorities of people are interested in fast-food and rarely do they consume home-cooked foods. In this way, hardly can human beings stay healthy owing to the fact that they cannot shun fast foods. To elucidate more on this issues, people these days do not pay attention to their diet due to the fact that they always think of money and saving a vast sum of a budget. Not only can unhealthy foods jeopardize our health but also can leave deleterious effects in the long run and create something disruptive.
Another equally salient point in corroborating my stance on this subject is that rely on unhealthy foods can create serious diseases. If we take a minute to ponder over it, these foods are made up of such ingredients like sugar, sauces and so forth, which put people's health into danger. These ingredients can cause threatening diseases in the long run because they are not nutritive. It can be deduced from a combination of breadth of coverage and depth of detail that people in the past were immune against various diseases because they always consumed nutritive meals. That being so, not until people stay with nourishing meals can they lead a healthy and honorable life.
However, every coin has two sides. With the advent of sophisticated technology, people are now more cognizant of different meals whether they are proper for their health or improper. Indeed, improvement in foods and science not only can develop people information about foods and their influence but also can raise awareness in the public and patronize people from unhealthy meals. However, it was a story in a nutshell, actually, there are more reasonable grounds that can lend weight to my personal perspective.
In light of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 318, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...iscussed brings us to the moot question as to whether foods in the past prevent people from l...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 652, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...t shun fast foods. To elucidate more on this issues, people these days do not pay at...
^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...end weight to my personal perspective. In light of reasons elaborated, I reiter...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, so, well, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 52.1666666667 146% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2456.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 495.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96161616162 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71684168287 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6780945825 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 264.0 212.727598566 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 759.6 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3246149177 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.636363636 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.22727272727 5.45110844103 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13466616813 0.236089414692 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0387856951715 0.076458572812 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425007067297 0.0737576698707 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.070866785652 0.150856017488 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0472234828489 0.0645574589148 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 86.8835125448 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.