Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Improving transportation is the best way for governments to promote economic growth. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
I am of the opinion that improving transportation can increase the economic growth of a country. Although this is not the only factor that would contribute to the growth of the economy, it plays a significant role in economic prosperity, as a poor transportation system is an underlying threat to a country’s financial well-being.
An improved transportation system would allow people to travel quickly from one place to another. The need for efficient travel is mostly felt by the working population of the country, as they are required to travel to and fro work within their region and sometimes even abroad. Enhancing transport would mean that less time and money are spent commuting. For example, if public transportation is introduced in areas dense with offices, companies could save the cost of arranging private transportation for their employees. This could also save time as public transports, such as metros, take a different route from cars, thus avoiding traffic.
An added benefit of improved transportation is the possible opportunity for increased tourism. This created an additional revenue stream for the country, thus improving the economy. For example, a town in my country, albeit being a photographer's dream, only had a handful of local visitors. The only drawback was that the road infrastructure was not up to the mark, making the journey extremely dangerous. However, since the government took steps to improve the roads, tourism in this region has been booming.
In short, I strongly believe that improving transportation can quicken the economic growth of a country. Not only does it allow people, such as office workers, to reach their destinations quickly, therefore reducing cost and time spent on traveling, rather it also creates a new revenue source for a country through expansion of tourism.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 622, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...etros, take a different route from cars, thus avoiding traffic. An added bene...
^^
Line 5, column 425, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... extremely dangerous. However, since the government took steps to improve the roa...
^^
Line 7, column 287, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng, rather it also creates a new revenue source for a country through expansion o...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, in short, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 52.1666666667 61% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1550.0 1977.66487455 78% => OK
No of words: 292.0 407.700716846 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30821917808 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.035885021 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571917808219 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 618.680645161 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7565719078 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.714285714 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8571428571 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78571428571 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167825467554 0.236089414692 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0668150390485 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052788347848 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107912976135 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0174362540996 0.0645574589148 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.