Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Printed books have had greater effects on society than televisions.
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Printed books have had greater effects on society than televisions.
Since the dawn of civilizations and invention of writing, books play significant role in societies. On the other hand, one of the most important milestones of recent decades is the advent of television. A controversial question which is often raised regarding these two methods of communications is related to their impacts on societies. Some people are inclined toward the opinion that books play more crucial role; while others look at this debate through a different lens, and assign more value to televisions. Personally I am more in agreement with latter one. In the following paragraphs, three conspicuous reasons will cogently substantiate my perspective.
The most significant reason is that now days TV is everywhere. Almost certainly you can find one not only in every house, but almost in all places of work, and that equals with possibly billions and billions of TV in all world. The same is not true for books. The number of available copies of each book all around the word in best conditions is not more than few millions. You can see this around yourself, even in your home. I am almost one hundred percent sure you have one (or in my case and perhaps many more cases, more than one) television set in your home, but do you have one copy of every books too? The answer will be a definite no. it is practically impossible. Even the Congress Library has not accomplished this task, yet.
Another reason which deserves some words here is the especial nature of TV that makes it a multifunctional tool, unlike books which in most cases just address one or few interdependent topics. It is unconventional to see a book that in each chapter deals with different issues. Actually in most circles this is a sign of unreliability. Most authors prefer to stick to specific frame to avoid this kind of branch jumping. So a reader who is looking for different types of information must allude to a number of different books. On the other hand, variety of programs is the distinguish point of a good TV channel. The directors of TV channels always try to add various flavors to their daily programs. In a survey that was conduct in Denmark, the data collected from 10 top TV channel showed their daily schedule of broadcast programs include news, sports, documentaries and educational programs in addition to television series and movies and a whole bunch of other programs. So a normal audience can gain different and diverse information just from on single TV set.
Although the aforementioned reasons are the first ones which cross the mind at first glance, they are by no means the only reasons available. Actually, there is another subtle point which must be borne in mind, and that is the ability of all level of society and all people to use television. Using the TV is not limited to having special training or certain level of education or particulars means. For instance even illiterate people have no problem when faced with one, but you cannot claim the same for books. Here the most fundamental prerequisite is the ability to read. Hence, automatically the illiterate part of societies is removed from the equation.
All the aforementioned reasons lead me to the conclusion that in modern societies televisions have greater impact and effects than books.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 569, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... the other hand, variety of programs is the distinguish point of a good TV channel. The directo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 633, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[3]
Message: You should probably use 'channel'.
Suggestion: channel
... a good TV channel. The directors of TV channels always try to add various flavors to th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 776, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'channel' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'channels'.
Suggestion: channels
...mark, the data collected from 10 top TV channel showed their daily schedule of broadcas...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 945, Rule ID: WHOLE_LOT[1]
Message: Use simply 'bunch'.
Suggestion: bunch
...n to television series and movies and a whole bunch of other programs. So a normal audience...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'but', 'first', 'hence', 'if', 'look', 'regarding', 'so', 'while', 'for instance', 'in addition', 'kind of', 'in most cases', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.253164556962 0.229887763892 110% => OK
Verbs: 0.125 0.158761421928 79% => OK
Adjectives: 0.102848101266 0.0866891130778 119% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0601265822785 0.046263068375 130% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0332278481013 0.0685040099705 49% => OK
Prepositions: 0.128164556962 0.118717715034 108% => OK
Participles: 0.0268987341772 0.0351676179071 76% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.82834692246 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0221518987342 0.0309702414327 72% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.104430379747 0.0887237588012 118% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0126582278481 0.0209618222197 60% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0142405063291 0.0139019557991 102% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3397.0 2387.08602151 142% => OK
No of words: 575.0 408.028673835 141% => OK
Chars per words: 5.90782608696 5.86048508987 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.89685180668 4.48200974243 109% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.339130434783 0.338922669872 100% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.250434782609 0.251872472559 99% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.168695652174 0.174417080927 97% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.121739130435 0.112833075102 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82834692246 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 297.0 212.727598566 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51652173913 0.524397521467 98% => OK
Word variations: 64.2445608952 59.2087087015 109% => OK
How many sentences: 33.0 20.6684587814 160% => OK
Sentence length: 17.4242424242 20.5533526081 85% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.8312106881 48.84282405 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.939393939 120.699889404 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4242424242 20.5533526081 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.424242424242 0.644075263715 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.5376344086 132% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.54480286738 72% => OK
Readability: 42.4677206851 45.7405998639 93% => OK
Elegance: 1.86956521739 1.45489161554 129% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254139964578 0.300154397459 85% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0788870183449 0.103427244359 76% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0631105931723 0.0752933317313 84% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.438906699399 0.497263757937 88% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.158997905177 0.151897553556 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0924357570531 0.114077575197 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132435932494 0.0781384742642 169% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.31499522379 0.336927656856 93% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0982900026801 0.067059652881 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.287466740618 0.210909579961 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.322954976142 0.0618886996521 522% => Less connections among paragraphs
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8870967742 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.86379928315 207% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.91756272401 163% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 8.42114695341 119% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.4623655914 81% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.75985663082 109% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 13.6433691756 110% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.