Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Sometimes people think nowadays the media (TV, newspaper, Internet) are less concerned about the accuracy of news than in the past, and the incorrect information may cause more problem to the public.
Nowadays, there is a wide range of debates whether the media are less concerned about the accuracy of news or not. In my opinion, the media like newspaper, TV, and the internet care more about the accuracy of news. I find this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the ensuing paragraphs.
To begin with, due to the progression of technology, people have great access to the media. In fact, large numbers of users in this field have caused an extreme competition among various types of media. Therefore, they know that if they transmit an incorrect news, people will no longer confide in them. An example will illustrate this viewpoint much better, as I remember, last year, a shopping mall had been fired in our town, all types of the media covered the news relating to the fired shopping mall. One famous website transmitted a false news about the cause of the fire. It was completely incorrect. As a result of transmitting false news, people did not follow their website. For this reason, because of competition aspects of the media, they should care about the accuracy of news.
Second, nowadays, people are experiencing the better lifestyle. In fact, they are really knowledgeable, mature enough; therefore, they easily understand what is true and what is not true. On the other hand, people living in the past were not mature and educated enough to understand the accuracy of the news, for this reason, it is easy to media to manipulate or change the accuracy of news. For example, when I was an undergraduate student, I had a part-time job at university campus magazine as a reporter. As I remember, one time, I had interviewed the chief editor of the magazine, who is working for 30 years in our magazine, about the ratio of complaint of students about the accuracy of news. He told me that, the ratio of complaints are not comparable to the past. Also, he told me that we check the accuracy of news several times before publishing. As a result, the more people will be knowledgeable and well-educated, the more the media are concerned about the accuracy of news.
In conclusion, no one can deny the concern of the current media about the accuracy of news. Not only do they care more about the accuracy of the news, but also they try more to show correct news in order to survive in the competitive world of the media.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 537, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'false news'.
Suggestion: false news
...ng mall. One famous website transmitted a false news about the cause of the fire. It was com...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, really, second, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1934.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 412.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69417475728 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64350587129 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.490291262136 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 626.4 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6082469013 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0952380952 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.619047619 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.09523809524 5.45110844103 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295868039965 0.236089414692 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0993617800266 0.076458572812 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0776967735095 0.0737576698707 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206280910391 0.150856017488 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328670107404 0.0645574589148 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.