Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Students can get as many benefits from organization or club activities as they can get from their academic studies.
Since the down of civilization, academic education has played significant role in the life of students. On the other hand, one of the most important milestones of education in the recent decades is the advent of group or club activities. A controversial question which is often raised regarding these two, is related to their effects on students life, and this question that whether club activity are as influential as academic studies or not. Some people are inclined toward the opinion that they are not as influential while others look at this debate through a different lens, and believe that they have the same range effectively. Personally I am more in agreement with the latter group. In following paragraph, some conspicuous reasons will cogently substantiate my perspective.
The first noteworthy point regarding this issue is the learning process involved in club activity. Students who participate in these kinds of activities will learn different lessons, from how to interact with other people to how accept the consequence of group failure or success. In my opinion, these are not the lessons which students can learn easily from academic studies. For example, imagine that you are a member in a club, something like club for management of campus landscape. Here, you have to deal with other students who are members too, and with people who are not member of the club, but users of the campus landscape. During your activity in this club, you will learn valuable lessons about public relationship in real life, a lesson which you will not learn through academic studies.
Finally, in addition to what was mentioned above, as recent studies have revealed, organized societies of students are a good places to simulating real job situations for students. In fact, a recent study which was conduct in Denmark among 10 university and 100 disciplines, showed that Academic studies, as you can ponder from the title, generally are teaching some objective information to students. In roughly 70 percent of these disciplines, the academic administrators did not emperies on the practical application of this information. Hence, the organized activity of the students is an excellent channel for them to try their theoretical knowledge.
To make a long story short, all the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that group and organized activities of students are as beneficial for students as academic studies. However, that was a story in nutshell; actually, there are some other reasons and examples, challenging the claim, which are not mentioned above. Finally, it is suggested that a survey be conducted to find out the exact factors involved in this issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 338, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...ese two, is related to their effects on students life, and this question that whether cl...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 530, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...e, you have to deal with other students who are members too, and with people who are no...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'but', 'finally', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'regarding', 'so', 'while', 'for example', 'in addition', 'in fact', 'in my opinion', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.248447204969 0.229887763892 108% => OK
Verbs: 0.134575569358 0.158761421928 85% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0848861283644 0.0866891130778 98% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0517598343685 0.046263068375 112% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0331262939959 0.0685040099705 48% => OK
Prepositions: 0.142857142857 0.118717715034 120% => OK
Participles: 0.0393374741201 0.0351676179071 112% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.86542638349 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0227743271222 0.0309702414327 74% => OK
Particles: 0.00207039337474 0.00188951952338 110% => OK
Determiners: 0.103519668737 0.0887237588012 117% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0124223602484 0.0209618222197 59% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0248447204969 0.0139019557991 179% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2683.0 2387.08602151 112% => OK
No of words: 433.0 408.028673835 106% => OK
Chars per words: 6.19630484988 5.86048508987 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.48200974243 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.385681293303 0.338922669872 114% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.307159353349 0.251872472559 122% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.249422632794 0.174417080927 143% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.154734411085 0.112833075102 137% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86542638349 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503464203233 0.524397521467 96% => OK
Word variations: 56.6850257424 59.2087087015 96% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6684587814 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.7894736842 20.5533526081 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8135687757 48.84282405 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.210526316 120.699889404 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7894736842 20.5533526081 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.842105263158 0.644075263715 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.54480286738 36% => OK
Readability: 53.5054090191 45.7405998639 117% => OK
Elegance: 1.96226415094 1.45489161554 135% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236804882043 0.300154397459 79% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.122431774624 0.103427244359 118% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0858784909896 0.0752933317313 114% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.49221206114 0.497263757937 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.109606639568 0.151897553556 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0939020892025 0.114077575197 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538741595543 0.0781384742642 69% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.439871066791 0.336927656856 131% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0263275452743 0.067059652881 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169930493289 0.210909579961 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335135460635 0.0618886996521 54% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8870967742 109% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.86379928315 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.91756272401 122% => OK
Positive topic words: 12.0 8.42114695341 142% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 2.4623655914 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.75985663082 145% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.6433691756 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.