Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Surviving, and more importantly succeeding, in the increasingly complex world requires us to have several factors: creativity, talent, diligence, sheer determination, to name a few. Among those, the creativity is accounted as a very important factor of successfulness. If we want to have successful children in their future careers and educations, developing creativity should be considered as the main preference from their childhood. But what does make new technology with a sense of novelty and creativity? Some believe that it is strongly harmful while some believe that it will help to growth creativity in a more efficient way. Personally speaking, I agree with the latter.
It can be clearly seen that the growth rate of technology has been greatly improved than the past. New inventions associated with high technological devices and also the advent of many conceptual ideas which have the ability to be realized, conspicuously show that today's technology not only have not negative effects on the inventors of the previous generation of human beings, but also helped them to increase the creative abilities; otherwise, we were not able to observe such a great development, nowadays.
The most important underlying reason of critics about the question is that since the technology prepares many things ready for us, children are used to not try to obtain those things anymore and in this way, technology made children's minds lazy and inactive. Take as an obvious example, stated by critics, calculators ease our expensive calculations while they make our minds unable to calculate even simple calculations, finally. I would believe that the criticism does forget that the way we use the objects returns to our learning. If children be taught to use calculators for expensive calculations, not for daily matters, it will not deteriorate minds. It is not able to find anything purely advantageous or disadvantageous in the world. Like everything, technology is a double-edged sword that should be treated cautiously.
From a different perspective, it is possible to consider new technology as a tool to escape us from the useless chores and provide us more time to focus on main interests. Today's technology provides us powerful computers, thereby; it has been possible many hypothetical assumptions to be verified. For example, I have recently heard that two physicians from Sweden have been verified one of the Einstein theories, helping by super computers. In fact, the new technology has removed many of limitations that people faced in the past and eased the way of creativity. In addition, it is no longer requires to spend a long time for household chores because technology brings us many digital and electronic appliances to ease our livings and pay more attention to our dreams and ideas.
To sum it up, although technology is like a double-edged sword, it can be effectively taught how to use and applied in many aspects of our lives without deteriorating children's creativity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 266, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'todays'' or 'today's'?
Suggestion: todays'; today's
...to be realized, conspicuously show that todays technology not only have not negative e...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 604, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'spending'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: spending
.... In addition, it is no longer requires to spend a long time for household chores becaus...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, so, while, for example, in addition, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2529.0 1977.66487455 128% => OK
No of words: 480.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26875 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68069463864 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08468368516 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 264.0 212.727598566 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 806.4 618.680645161 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.0243475139 48.9658058833 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.45 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 5.45110844103 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162417556536 0.236089414692 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0505167284811 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.040335826346 0.0737576698707 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0903728206852 0.150856017488 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0278885747105 0.0645574589148 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 11.7677419355 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 58.1214874552 67% => It means the essay is relatively harder to read.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 86.8835125448 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Try to use less pronouns (like 'It, I, They, We, You...') as the subject of a sentence.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.