Each company has specific needs during its presence and as a result, new expectations might emerge during the time. In order to respond to these needs, they have two options, either recruit new employees or ask their current employees to enable themselves by going to university. Obviously, going to university needs financial support which I believe the company should pay for it.
Although recruiting new workers may seems more cost effective at first, but the company actually should spend more in this case because the new workforces need a whole new training before they can start working at the company. The newcomers need time to get used to their new work environment and know their co-workers. The initial training program takes time and money which is quite high while it is not clear if they want to stay after their training. So, it is more cost efficient for employers to spend money on their current employees.
The older employees are also more reliable since they have been in the company before and have shown their capabilities, so they deserve the companies' investing. Consider a car factory that needs a designer with the understanding to work with the new car making methods which are coming to the car industry. If they employ a new designer, he or she doesn't know companies' objectives, so he may not be able to answer to the demands in first place. While a person who has worked there for years, completely understands the companies' atmosphere and he or she could grab essential materials from university lectures. Therefore, this worker can bring new methods to the company according to its demands.
All in all, investing on a worker who put his life in a company or agency is a more plausible way than hiring someone new with desired education. Nonetheless, employees spend their time and energy for the benefit of the company otherwise they don't have to go to university.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 351, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...f they employ a new designer, he or she doesnt know companies objectives, so he may no...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 522, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'companies'' or 'company's'?
Suggestion: companies'; company's
...e for years, completely understands the companies atmosphere and he or she could grab ess...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 244, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...e benefit of the company otherwise they dont have to go to university.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, may, nonetheless, so, therefore, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1588.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 323.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91640866873 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64182307683 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557275541796 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9393463142 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.428571429 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0714285714 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92857142857 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163764807196 0.236089414692 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0650766802359 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514512057803 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113166777511 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385717287899 0.0645574589148 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.