Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Throughout history people would like to know about every event and news. Certainly, some of information about specific news is true and some of them are wrong. People always like to have correct and exact information to be totally aware. Doubtlessly, some people if asked would agree with the statement that in order to be completely aware about a n event you need to read or listen many various resources while others would mention that the question depends on a great deal of factors; for example someone would have powerful insight that help them to be well-informed if get information from only one or a few resources rather than a lot of different news resources. As far as I am concerned, I adopt a firm position that awareness of every event is actually related to our knowledge from various resources particularly if you live in countries with limited truthful media. In what follows I will cogently pinpoint most conspicuous reasons to justify my point of view.
First of all, it's important to consider all resources are not impartial, that is, between different resources some of them doubtlessly transform information subjectively. Therefore, if you read or listen, only one or limited resources actually their point of view would be biased. By way of example, I can recall news about Muslim' slaughter in Myanmar in some pages on internet is very different from many other news resources because they are united with Mrs Sochi, Myanmar' president.
Another significant point to be mentioned is that when you pay attention to different resources indeed you pay attention to different point of views. Actually, if you study or listen various resources, you will be aware about great idea or point of views about specific event. It helps you to think about it and compare different idea and choose the best stance. To illustrate that idea let's consider the following example. Back in university period, I remember my history class project that I had to gather some information about using USA of atomic bomb in World war II; after reading a lot of resources I could find some impressive information that some students did not listen.
By way of conclusion, based on the argument explored above, I'm of the opinion that in most cases someone could be completely aware about news when they listen and grasp various resources' idea and point of views. Consequently, it is highly recommended that children and juvenile learn how get reliable information and recognize true and false information, what information are dependable and why they should be sensitive about being totally aware about authenticity of news that they would hear or read.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 347, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...t in order to be completely aware about a n event you need to read or listen many...
^
Line 7, column 61, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
..., based on the argument explored above, Im of the opinion that in most cases someo...
^^
Line 7, column 178, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'resources'' or 'resource's'?
Suggestion: resources'; resource's
...news when they listen and grasp various resources idea and point of views. Consequently, ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, consequently, first, if, so, then, therefore, well, while, for example, first of all, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2213.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 441.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01814058957 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73963257828 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501133786848 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 701.1 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 96.714059862 48.9658058833 198% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.3125 100.406767564 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5625 20.6045352989 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8125 5.45110844103 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236451288627 0.236089414692 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0804727244538 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540176011034 0.0737576698707 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150844015092 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0597155500474 0.0645574589148 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 11.7677419355 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 58.1214874552 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.