Do you agree or disagree with following statement?
It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Life is a matrix of many relationship. One of the significant connection is friends. People can have few or a lot of friends, it is due to their demand. Some people believe that keeping old friends is important, but on other hand, some people trend to have new friendships. In my opinion, I think that old friends are valuable gifts, so it is crucial for me to keep these friends.
It takes a very long time for each people to have an old relationship. This connection must undergo variety of difficulty. I am fortunate person when having some old friends. We have had a lot of memories, both happy and sad. In result, we understand each other very much. Whenever my old friend is painful or has any questions, the first person that she remembers is me. In contrast, I remember when I failed first time at university, I ran to my old friend and cried as a child. She listened to me and helped me feel better. We even could chat all day about whatever we want, from work, healthy, passion to clothes, cosmetics. Of course, you cannot do it with a new friend. I mean, old friends are people who we enough trust and understand us enough for us to share all issue of life.
Additionally, I want to say about difficulties in life. People always have problems must overcome. However, important thing is who is people will stay side by side you in this period of time. Here, I impress that they are your old friends. People mature and their parents cannot always help them when they have some issue. It is a fact that, when people have any problem, their old friends is people who will stay and help them solve their problems. New friends are not enough ardor and trust to help us in these situations.
Some people can say that new friendship help people have more relationship and more opportunities to develop future jobs or career. Nevertheless, I believe new connections will not be too sincere when we have issue. What is more, it is not sure if these new friends come with me loyal, it could be some other reasons. There for, it takes quite long time to trust and share about ourselves.
In conclusion, I want to repeat role of old friend in life of each people. You cannot have money, you cannot have career, but it is impossible if you do not have friends. Friends is people who help me in the most difficult time of life, especially old friends. It is mean that you should treasure your old friends who if you lose, you will never have again.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 21, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun relationship seems to be countable; consider using: 'many relationships'.
Suggestion: many relationships
Life is a matrix of many relationship. One of the significant connection is f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 176, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ople will stay side by side you in this period of time. Here, I impress that they are your old...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 318, Rule ID: IF_IS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...ou should treasure your old friends who if you lose, you will never have again.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, nevertheless, so, i mean, i think, in conclusion, in contrast, of course, in my opinion, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 71.0 43.0788530466 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2003.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 448.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.47098214286 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4958980618 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.453125 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 612.0 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 26.0 9.59856630824 271% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 2.0 0.994623655914 201% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 20.6003584229 150% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.3165053991 48.9658058833 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 64.6129032258 100.406767564 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.4516129032 20.6045352989 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.06451612903 5.45110844103 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 22.0 11.8709677419 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208914808336 0.236089414692 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0633419108073 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636748667669 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137016101244 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0363500374013 0.0645574589148 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.8 11.7677419355 58% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 58.1214874552 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.1575268817 63% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.05 10.9000537634 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.55 8.01818996416 82% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 86.8835125448 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.