Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The advice from grandparents is of no use to their grandchildren because the world has changed a lot over the past 500 years
Getting advice is an inevitable part of people lives since their lives are becoming more difficult. I strongly agree that grandparent’s advice does not have any advantages because the world has changed enormously. In what follows, I will pinpoint the most irrefutable reasons.
To being with, there is no relation between the current and past issues. To elaborate, with the progression of technology, people are experiencing something that they have not been in the past. Hence, imagine that under this circumstance how people can rely on ones who did not experience such these things. Thus, owing to lack of any experience, it is highly probable that this advice adds some problems to their currents issues because of insufficient information. For example, take the computer as an example, people living in 50 years ago could not work computer, for this reason, how they can help you, what is worse, if you ask them, I am sure that a bunch of your time will be wasted. As a result, due to lack of any relation among what people are using compared with the past, getting advice from grandparents is the last solution.
Apart from inadequate information, the second debatable point is that since grandparents always want the best thing for their children and they are really compassionate, their advice is strongly dependable. However, others believe that due to the available update source of information, people think that the grandparents' advice is old fashion and unreliable. I will take the former point with a pinch of salt and claim that the latter idea is really close to the reality, for I do believe that, nowadays, people have an easy access to the plenty of information on the online sources. To elucidate, this updated information is provided by the current people who are keeping touch on the present issues. In addition, since the grandparents, physical status is becoming worse and worse, and the power of their mind has decreased over time, people cannot count on them. Consequently, compared the old and weakened way of thinking with the current strong and up-to-date information, it is really hard to trust in their advice.
To wrap it up, by considering all aforementioned reasons, one soon realizes the negative importance of getting advice from grandparents inasmuch as in the first place, progression of technology makes their advice unpractical due to lack of experience, as in the second place, since they are old, and also presence of a great deal of novel information, counting on their advice cannot be a good idea.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 4, Rule ID: BEING_BEGIN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'begin'?
Suggestion: begin
...int the most irrefutable reasons. To being with, there is no relation between the ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 310, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'grandparents'' or 'grandparent's'?
Suggestion: grandparents'; grandparent's
...e of information, people think that the grandparents advice is old fashion and unreliable. I...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 519, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'easy access'.
Suggestion: easy access
... do believe that, nowadays, people have an easy access to the plenty of information on the onl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, hence, however, if, really, second, so, thus, apart from, for example, in addition, as a result, in the first place, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2136.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 423.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04964539007 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86533209936 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527186761229 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 669.6 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.5124737945 48.9658058833 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.5 100.406767564 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4375 20.6045352989 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1875 5.45110844103 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237791981801 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0776854300893 0.076458572812 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604682083647 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144339093347 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0265809833432 0.0645574589148 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 58.1214874552 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.