Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more
effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
From a broad perspective, in the current state of affairs we face, in which education is accounted as an integral part of those who envision bright future for themselves, it is not far-teched to presume that apllying the proper teaching approaches plays undniable role to that end. However, which method brings more advantages for students depends on the lens through which one is looking. There is a growing segment of people who contend this idea that team working privides more opportinuties for students to learn more effectively rather than individual studying. I personally concur with this idea, and in the ensuing paragraph, the rationale behind this opinion will be further elaborated.
First and foremost, competition in the group is a stimulus factor. There is no denying the fact that the human requires motivation for every single step taken throughout the life. That is why every prosperous system, regardless of its purpose, necessitates to identify various indicators to inspire its members to move toward better circumstances. Undoubtedly, compition is the primary means in this regard. Education system by provideing the instructive competition atmosphere for children increases the students' chance to challenge their skills in comparison to their counterpart. Admiteddly, having worked together as a team, the students not only practice how to cooperate with each other by undertaking particualr responsibilities but also learn how to compete with each other to become prior(). So, they have decided to learn better and more to achieve their goals. In comparision, students studying alone have not any indicator to measure their ability and they pass up their chance to augments their abilities.
aNother vital point which should be taken into consideration is that children can learn from each other. Needless to say that aside from this fact that members fight to become better, the ultimate goal is present the result as a team. Subsequently, the assist each other to improve the overall level of the group in multitude facets. For instance, if a person does know how to do analytical process, he can get acquainted with these new conceots through other members. Thus, the varioous parts of the material will be calrified for them. Rarely do students find this opportunity to get others' assitance when they study individually.
To wrap it up, it is more judicious to say that group working is the most suitable solution for students to get new materials effectively. Indeed, not only do competition persuade them to study more and learn better, but also other members helps them to become dominant on varied issues.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 273, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ching approaches plays undniable role to that end. However, which method brings m...
^^
Line 2, column 831, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...e prior. So, they have decided to learn better and more to achieve their goals. In com...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 2, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: ANother
...r chance to augments their abilities. aNother vital point which should be taken into ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 211, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...n persuade them to study more and learn better, but also other members helps them to b...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, so, thus, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2221.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 423.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25059101655 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83746644833 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572104018913 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 686.7 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3105055313 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.05 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.15 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.95 5.45110844103 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1564076188 0.236089414692 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0445622143999 0.076458572812 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466533930236 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0956064180679 0.150856017488 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00833379887914 0.0645574589148 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 86.8835125448 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.