Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more
effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Throughout history humans who have lived and communicated next each other in different societies have had different tastes; some would like to do their work individually, but some of them would like to do with each other. In modern era, students in university or schools are individuals who have different tastes. A controversial question which is often raised regarding this issue is whether students ought to work alone or with each other in groups. Certainly, some people if asked, would agree with the statement that students in groups have more chances to learn, while others would mention that solitary working force students to work harder and try to learn more things .As far as I am concerned, I adopt a firm position that students should work in a group particularly if they are going to work on a project. In what follows I will cogently pinpoint my most conspicuous reasons to justify my point of view.
First of all, it is important to consider some ideas or thoughts instead of on idea or one strategy will have better result. As a matter of fact, in a specific dilemma, students have their unique ideas to resolve this problem. Different point of view is more effective because they could test various ways to get the best result. To illustrate that idea let's consider the following example. I remember, my last year of university when I was dealing with a project on fluid mechanic. After a while, I realized that I was not able to solve a problem which spent a couple of months. When I consulted with my professor, he introduced 2 other students who were experienced and intelligent. After one month, we solve the problem and published a good paper.
Another equally significant point to be mentioned is that working in a group is accompanied with happy times that help members to be more energetic, active and enthusiastic to proceed the project to get better performance. Indeed, when some humans with identical aim communicate with each other, after a little while learn their habits and in most cases their relationship will turn into fraternity. This friendship helps students to generate pleasant atmosphere in the group and inspire decent morale into groups to do works with more incentive. By way of example, I can recall my college period when my friends and I did homework and school projects in our group that named bad boys. We have fun times that encouraged us to work more times, energetically.
In addition to what was mentioned above, dividing duties or tasks helps students to work more quickly. It is obvious that in a group students could divide different tasks and delegate every duty to someone who is more specialized in that context. Subsequently, when everyone does their favorite work, they certainly proceed their work more quickly with more precise and eventually better result. Take a personal experience as an example; back in university, in final project, the professor designated a difficult project for 3 of us. In that specific project, I was responsible of experiment, writing program was one' duty and last person was responsible of collecting data and writing project. Our project is one of the best projects of our university with four published papers.
By way of conclusion, based on the arguments explored above, I am of the opinion that in most cases students could learn more and do their project with higher performance in lower time. Working in a group is far better because some thoughts certainly are better than one idea, and happy air assist student to work willingly. Besides, dividing tasks is a good strategy to fulfill project quickly. Consequently, it is highly recommended that authorities put more emphasis on group thinking because experiences indicate that human could develop increasingly when accomplish their works in groups.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 676, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...work harder and try to learn more things .As far as I am concerned, I adopt a firm...
^^
Line 1, column 678, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: As
...rk harder and try to learn more things .As far as I am concerned, I adopt a firm p...
^^
Line 7, column 134, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'student'?
Suggestion: student
... quickly. It is obvious that in a group students could divide different tasks and delega...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, first, if, regarding, so, thus, while, as to, in addition, as a matter of fact, first of all, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 27.0 11.0286738351 245% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 92.0 52.1666666667 176% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3178.0 1977.66487455 161% => OK
No of words: 636.0 407.700716846 156% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99685534591 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.02185627292 4.48103885553 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76019851796 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 302.0 212.727598566 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474842767296 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 990.9 618.680645161 160% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 4.94265232975 263% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.3877359089 48.9658058833 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.5 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.82142857143 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297137407967 0.236089414692 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0801192310337 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547527329145 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18088426019 0.150856017488 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403543191906 0.0645574589148 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 157.0 86.8835125448 181% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.