The reading passage contends that there are several points why some archeologists believe that a European silver coin is not original historical evidences. On the other hand, the lecturer brings about several points that contradict this agreement.
To begin with, the lecturer questions the validity of the reading passage that Maine where the coin was discovered in the Native American site is located in the distance from where a Norse presence in North America was documented. This is attributed to the fact that there are another object including the coin had brought from far distance. It presents that the Native American had traveled far distance. Thus, the reading passage’s first point is invalid.
Moreover, the lecturer cast doubt on the reading passage that there was no other coins have been discovered at the Canadian sites that were inhabited by the Norse. This is because at the Canadian sites that were inhabited by the Norse had created valuable objects using permanent sediment. Further, the Natives brought back with valuable coins and other objects when they are returning from there. Consequently, the reading passage’s second point is contradicted.
Last but not least, the lecturer disagrees with the idea in the reading passage that the Norse who traveled across the Atlantic Ocean would have understood that the coins would be likely to them being useless. It is obvious that the Natives have already known that the coins are valuable and appeals them to bring them into their place because it also looks beautiful to them, such as necklaces and Jewels. As a result, the reading passage’s last point is refuted.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading passage contends that there ...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...points that contradict this agreement. To begin with, the lecturer questions th...
^^
Line 2, column 287, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'objects'?
Suggestion: objects
...uted to the fact that there are another object including the coin had brought from far...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...passage's first point is invalid. Moreover, the lecturer cast doubt on the...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e's second point is contradicted. Last but not least, the lecturer disagre...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'consequently', 'first', 'if', 'look', 'moreover', 'second', 'so', 'thus', 'such as', 'as a result', 'to begin with', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.24584717608 0.229887763892 107% => OK
Verbs: 0.179401993355 0.158761421928 113% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0897009966777 0.0866891130778 103% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0398671096346 0.046263068375 86% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0299003322259 0.0685040099705 44% => OK
Prepositions: 0.106312292359 0.118717715034 90% => OK
Participles: 0.0598006644518 0.0351676179071 170% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.60032466031 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0166112956811 0.0309702414327 54% => OK
Particles: 0.00332225913621 0.00188951952338 176% => OK
Determiners: 0.129568106312 0.0887237588012 146% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00664451827243 0.0209618222197 32% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0299003322259 0.0139019557991 215% => Maybe 'Which' is overused. If other WH_determiners like 'Who, What, Whom, Whose...' are used too in sentences, then there are no issues.
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1662.0 2387.08602151 70% => OK
No of words: 267.0 408.028673835 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.22471910112 5.86048508987 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.48200974243 90% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.36329588015 0.338922669872 107% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.314606741573 0.251872472559 125% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.198501872659 0.174417080927 114% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.104868913858 0.112833075102 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60032466031 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 212.727598566 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513108614232 0.524397521467 98% => OK
Word variations: 49.5249485845 59.2087087015 84% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6684587814 63% => OK
Sentence length: 20.5384615385 20.5533526081 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.2620882047 48.84282405 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.846153846 120.699889404 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5384615385 20.5533526081 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.07692307692 0.644075263715 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.54480286738 90% => OK
Readability: 51.9991356958 45.7405998639 114% => OK
Elegance: 1.65333333333 1.45489161554 114% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189942522929 0.300154397459 63% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.152401711029 0.103427244359 147% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.105424788844 0.0752933317313 140% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.623013534901 0.497263757937 125% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.154799412638 0.151897553556 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0939713391687 0.114077575197 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411736101987 0.0781384742642 53% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.432395914594 0.336927656856 128% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0601084323471 0.067059652881 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14081624237 0.210909579961 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0222198697842 0.0618886996521 36% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8870967742 34% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.86379928315 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.91756272401 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 2.0 8.42114695341 24% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 4.0 2.4623655914 162% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.75985663082 109% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 13.6433691756 66% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.