Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
I certainly agree that young people today do not give sufficient time and energy to assist their communities. Somebody can consciously weigh the pros and cons of each side. The explanations go as follows.
Firstly, modern technology changes young persons' attitudes toward the life. These days, all people experience a huge advancement and improvement in different fields of technology and science including transportation, communication, health caring, and artificial intelligence. All of these theoretical and practical achievements not only change human's physical world but also affect young people's opinion and idea toward the universe, creation, and life. In fact, youngsters now perhaps are more interested to move or being up to date with new inventions and equipments such as smart phones or digital computers. In other words, nowadays, in the view of young people, helping to the communities does not have a same priority that had in the past.
Furthermore, time limitation is another noticeable support. Nowadays, both young and old people have to work hard enough to make more money, and so purchase whatever they like or want. Someone, for instance, has to start his work early in the morning and continue it until late at night. Besides, the school or university assignments possibly keep youngster busy for long hours, and as a consequence there is no any free time for children to allot for their communities.
Admittedly, there are some justifications by one who argues that youngsters now devote more time for communities. Mainly, university teachers and professors try to aware youth about communities’ importance or valuable for society. In additional, there are lots of youth voluntary groups which attempt to contribute communities. However still I affirm that boys and girls today do not dedicate adequate time or attention to their communities. Although there are some awareness and group activities, based on a research study, which has been carried out by Harvard University in 2015, only 30% of young people participated in those mentioned groups. It also predicts that this participation will be reduced to 20% for next year.
Due to aforementioned ground, I think that all folk should bear in mind that young men and women nowadays do not pay necessary time to their communities. Participation of thinking and time are two prime and conspicuous factors.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 410, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...ng hours, and as a consequence there is no any free time for children to allot for...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, still, as to, for instance, i think, in addition, in fact, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 13.8261648746 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2020.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 378.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34391534392 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05834751851 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62962962963 0.524837075471 120% => OK
syllable_count: 628.2 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5677411698 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 5.45110844103 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237530779183 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0634646718789 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0793910516033 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136237654537 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545220756878 0.0645574589148 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.