Do you agree or disagree with this statement
most advertisements make product seem much better than they really are.
By growing population more and more and increasing use of development technologies, the people's tendency to shopping is increased as well. Moreover, producers are seeking the better ways to persuade people to buy their products even by using of ling. I personally believe that in advertisements the products are better than they really are. There are three main reasons to show why I have this preference.
First and foremost, most of the producers are only thinking about the way they could absorb the customers. This means that they use some exaggerated advertisements to show the products in the best form. This happens through different ways such as increasing function of a device, makes it more beautiful or more qualified. For example, I often see in satellite’s channels some drugs are advertised which can use for losing weight, although, according to the researchers, there is no way to losing weight except doing regular exercises and decreasing the amount of food meals.
Another prominent reason is that despite the lower quality of these products than something they really are, any person rejects them. This matter is because their seller never take the responsibility of sold product. Eventually, if the customers are unsatisfied with the product, they only refute to buy it again; but, it takes the long time to all people figure out to not to buy the especial product. As an instance, I have heard several times that after a long time selling of an especial product, it has been said that it had not had any license to be sold.
Last but not least, in advertisement, the producers try to make the appearance of their products more attractive. This is the way to deceiving people, because honesty is the most crucially important rule for trading.
To sum up, in order to absorbing more customer, the advertisements make products seem much better than they really are.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 89, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...ng use of development technologies, the peoples tendency to shopping is increased as we...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 246, Rule ID: LING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'long'?
Suggestion: long
... to buy their products even by using of ling. I personally believe that in advertise...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'if', 'moreover', 'really', 'so', 'well', 'for example', 'such as', 'to sum up']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.197740112994 0.229887763892 86% => OK
Verbs: 0.186440677966 0.158761421928 117% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0819209039548 0.0866891130778 94% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0649717514124 0.046263068375 140% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0536723163842 0.0685040099705 78% => OK
Prepositions: 0.107344632768 0.118717715034 90% => OK
Participles: 0.0564971751412 0.0351676179071 161% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.84630041491 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Infinitives: 0.045197740113 0.0309702414327 146% => OK
Particles: 0.00564971751412 0.00188951952338 299% => OK
Determiners: 0.107344632768 0.0887237588012 121% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00564971751412 0.0209618222197 27% => Some modal verbs wanted.
WH_determiners: 0.00847457627119 0.0139019557991 61% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1892.0 2387.08602151 79% => OK
No of words: 315.0 408.028673835 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.00634920635 5.86048508987 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.48200974243 94% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.339682539683 0.338922669872 100% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.266666666667 0.251872472559 106% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.2 0.174417080927 115% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.136507936508 0.112833075102 121% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84630041491 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565079365079 0.524397521467 108% => OK
Word variations: 60.806983447 59.2087087015 103% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6684587814 73% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5533526081 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7483940216 48.84282405 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.133333333 120.699889404 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.5533526081 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 0.644075263715 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.54480286738 36% => OK
Readability: 47.6666666667 45.7405998639 104% => OK
Elegance: 1.18518518519 1.45489161554 81% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169403249556 0.300154397459 56% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0845178211513 0.103427244359 82% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0598200208996 0.0752933317313 79% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.560853023001 0.497263757937 113% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.169260397327 0.151897553556 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0844946648351 0.114077575197 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0855292777292 0.0781384742642 109% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.320841045755 0.336927656856 95% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0616701454847 0.067059652881 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135094899425 0.210909579961 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.088821574893 0.0618886996521 144% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8870967742 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.86379928315 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.91756272401 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 8.42114695341 107% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.4623655914 122% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.75985663082 72% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 13.6433691756 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.