Do you agree or disagree with this statement
Teachers should not make their social or political views known to student in the classroom.
When it comes to the education, students, and classroom there are so many factors which have to be considered because of sensitivity of these issues and their result in the future of each country. I personally do agree with not to making social or political views known to students by teachers. There are three main reasons to show why I have this preference.
First and foremost, generally, classroom is not a proper place to political or social discussions. Students in school age are so delicate and impressionable so, they will be affected by even the simplest things. As a result, it would not be fair to destroy their concentration and focus by these useless issues. In other words, it is very soon for students especially in primary schools to be familiar with such a complicated matters. For example, as I remember, when I was going to primary school one of my teachers had some especial attitude toward the government and usually she discussed the problem in class. These matters were highly impacted me but I could not solve those political issues in my mind. Therefore they turned to some big problems which I was thinking about most of the time.
Moreover, considering the fact that children are not be able to make decision logically, these especial issues can deviate their mind or cause to brain washing. In addition, discussing political issues in school could be a way of abusing children. It would be possible that teachers express their opinion about political issues with some specific goals. Therefore all kinds of discussion with social or political purposes should not be allowed.
Last but not least, school is a place to talents flourishing of students but not a place to pressure children by some complicated material. Students should have time to learn something which is useful for their future life.
To sum up, according to the reasons mentioned above, teachers should not states their social or political views in the classroom.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 427, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'matter'?
Suggestion: matter
... to be familiar with such a complicated matters. For example, as I remember, when I was...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 710, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...olve those political issues in my mind. Therefore they turned to some big problems which ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 54, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...sidering the fact that children are not be able to make decision logically, these ...
^^
Line 5, column 144, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'braining'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: braining
... issues can deviate their mind or cause to brain washing. In addition, discussing politi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 355, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...itical issues with some specific goals. Therefore all kinds of discussion with social or ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 74, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'state'
Suggestion: state
...ns mentioned above, teachers should not states their social or political views in the ...
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'therefore', 'for example', 'in addition', 'as a result', 'in other words', 'to sum up']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.216066481994 0.229887763892 94% => OK
Verbs: 0.149584487535 0.158761421928 94% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0969529085873 0.0866891130778 112% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0609418282548 0.046263068375 132% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0609418282548 0.0685040099705 89% => OK
Prepositions: 0.108033240997 0.118717715034 91% => OK
Participles: 0.0415512465374 0.0351676179071 118% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.71829062905 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0470914127424 0.0309702414327 152% => OK
Particles: 0.00277008310249 0.00188951952338 147% => OK
Determiners: 0.0747922437673 0.0887237588012 84% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0249307479224 0.0209618222197 119% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.016620498615 0.0139019557991 120% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1965.0 2387.08602151 82% => OK
No of words: 329.0 408.028673835 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.9726443769 5.86048508987 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.48200974243 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.373860182371 0.338922669872 110% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.279635258359 0.251872472559 111% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.218844984802 0.174417080927 125% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.127659574468 0.112833075102 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71829062905 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534954407295 0.524397521467 102% => OK
Word variations: 56.5500905343 59.2087087015 96% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6684587814 82% => OK
Sentence length: 19.3529411765 20.5533526081 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9103647075 48.84282405 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.588235294 120.699889404 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3529411765 20.5533526081 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.647058823529 0.644075263715 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.54480286738 108% => OK
Readability: 47.3164670123 45.7405998639 103% => OK
Elegance: 1.34693877551 1.45489161554 93% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.380816566345 0.300154397459 127% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0731122545753 0.103427244359 71% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0351991872526 0.0752933317313 47% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.517365094241 0.497263757937 104% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.174157309648 0.151897553556 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146938550809 0.114077575197 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115608863783 0.0781384742642 148% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.268127104314 0.336927656856 80% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.114174782104 0.067059652881 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.26463353993 0.210909579961 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10195653964 0.0618886996521 165% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8870967742 42% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.86379928315 129% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.91756272401 142% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 8.42114695341 47% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.4623655914 81% => OK
Neutral topic words: 7.0 2.75985663082 254% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 13.6433691756 95% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.