Quality of education is an important factor that affects universities ranking. Although some people assume to improve education quality we should increase professors' salaries, in my opinion, it will not have the expected result. There are other effective elements, while university professors also need other things besides salary to offer higher quality education.
In a university, different elements should work properly, in order to system provide a good educational atmosphere. Professors are only one element in the system and other factors like teaching method, student performance, and universities' facilities have their own influence on education quality. Without a modern teaching method which involves students in materials, a professor cannot convey information to the students. As an example, I had problems in learning mathematics in university but after my university recruit a new professor in mathematics, my problems have solved. That happened because he was a young professor with a new teaching method who has an entry-level salary. In addition, when students are not enthusiastic enough to learn new materials, education quality will not improve because the students cannot absorb course materials. Finally, when the university does not have adequate education facility such as laboratories, students cannot learn what they taught in the classrooms, thoroughly.
On the other hand, spending more money on professors' salary only increase their individual satisfaction. However, professors actually need more research budget so they can expand their research activities and as a result, can attract competent students to the university. Without enough research budget, professors have no option other than reducing practical research and stick to simulations which reduces student understanding on their specialty. For example, students who study basic physical particles need special labs to study these basic particles or a student who study languages should have access to a good language laboratory to practice. Therefore, it seems other factors have a more prominent effect on education quality than professor's salaries.
It is my understanding that professor's salary plays a small role in education quality and other factors such as education method, students, and university facilities have a more promising effect on quality of education.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 43, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
... the other hand, spending more money on professors salary only increase their individual s...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 29, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...alaries. It is my understanding that professors salary plays a small role in education ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, but, finally, however, if, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in addition, such as, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2025.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 350.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.78571428571 4.8611393121 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98920643349 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 651.6 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.51630824373 125% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5927498828 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.5625 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 5.45110844103 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194533736288 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0755492362337 0.076458572812 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061186148733 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151723399835 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0569369111277 0.0645574589148 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 11.7677419355 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 58.1214874552 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.1575268817 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.3 10.9000537634 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.247311828 166% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.