Like lawyers and doctors who need ongoing training to excel in their field, teachers are also required to receive continuous and rigorous training to provide students the best educational experience. Some argue that few excellent teachers should be selected and trained by experts and then these teachers can provide training for the rest of the teachers while others insist that all of the teachers should be trained on line. Personally, I think the benefits of second option outweigh that of the first one based on the following reasons.
To begin with, it is a tough job to decide who are the excellent teachers. Any dispute and disagreement in the selection process lead to serious trouble. Admittedly, there are some universal qualities of good teachers like patience, experience, educational background, so on and so forth. However, excellent teachers are hard to define and different people tend to have distinctive standards when judging the quality of a good teacher. Some might place more importance on patience while others think teachers' experience and educational background matter much more. The insecure officials in the school might play favoritism toward the teachers who are their supporters and not select the teachers who are dissidents. Since the selection process is not based on merits and qualification, it will lead to the lack of morale among the teachers, which in turn will jeopardize students' educational experience. Fortunately, online training gives every teacher a fair chance to attend.
Additionally, online training can be as effective as face-to-face training and it is more cost-efficient. Currently, lots of high schools face serious budget problems. It is obvious that training delivered by the experts in a classroom is much more expensive than on line coaching. On line training is less costly in a sense that it is not bound by the number of teachers and the cost stays the same even when the number of teachers increase. More importantly, with the advent of advanced technology, on line training can also provide very effective result. State of the art technology like webcam makes it possible for the trainer and trainee to interact freely.
In conclusion, it is more advisable to provide training to all the teachers on-line since no specific standard can be applied in selecting excellent teachers and online training will be less costly but as effective as face-to-face training provided by experts.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 381, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...f the teachers while others insist that all of the teachers should be trained on line. Per...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 698, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
... supporters and not select the teachers who are dissidents. Since the selection process...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 559, Rule ID: STATE_OF_THE_ART[1]
Message: Did you mean 'state-of-the-art'?
Suggestion: State-of-the-art
...can also provide very effective result. State of the art technology like webcam makes it possibl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, then, while, i think, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 43.0788530466 37% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2064.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 392.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26530612245 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87423821463 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502551020408 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 641.7 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3859693964 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.666666667 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7777777778 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0860556193138 0.236089414692 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0348993252094 0.076458572812 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499613807539 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0615224533467 0.150856017488 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033434255924 0.0645574589148 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.