Face-to-face communication vs. emails or phone calls
With the rapid growth in the technology, using the kinds of stuff like telephone, emails, and cell phones have broadened. Many people hold the view that these communications are not comparable with face-to-face communications. But I believe that they can be so useful. Here I am going to enumerate some reasons to support my idea.
First, they help you to have a communication with your friend in all over the world as fast as possible. I mean that due to the enhancement of people’s problems in nowadays, you can’t ask them to make an appointment and endure a traffic to see you in your home or park or wherever. Take one of my friends, for example, one day he asked me to solve his math problem and clarify him how I did it. On the other hand, their house is far away from our place. So I took a video and explain the way that I solve that problem and send it to him by email. Or another situation that I remember was the time that I wanted to talk with my elder brother in Austrailia. I just took my phone and called him! Without a doubt, it was impossible to had a face-to-face connection instantly on that time.
Second, suppose a condition that you want to ask or maybe reject a thing but due to your embarrassing or pudency, you can’t do it. So you can just texting or write an email to him/her. I mean in the face-to-face communication you may not express your idea or say NO to the issues that you don't agree with them, easily. As an evidence consider that your friend wants you to borrow him your coat which you once wore it in a party that he was there. On the other hand, it is valuable for you because it is your graduation’s gift from your mother. If this demanded bring out in the face-to-face condition maybe you can’t refuse it. But you can texting him and say sorry comfortably.
Give the factors I outlined above, we may reach the conclusion that, as time progressed and the communication craft improves, it would impossible to elude using of emails or phone calls. Especially that saving the time is one of the important challengings of humans these days. However, some may oppose with these intuitions. Although we can’t neglect that in the face-to-face condition you can transfer your emotions of anxiety, tension, fear, happiness or apprehension with your facial so conveniently, but in my view, these agents can’t replace by new communication’s facilities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 166, Rule ID: IN_NOWADAYS[1]
Message: nowadays is used without 'in'. Use simply: 'nowadays'.
Suggestion: nowadays
...e enhancement of people's problems in nowadays, you can't ask them to make an app...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 237, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'traffic'.
Suggestion: traffic
... them to make an appointment and endure a traffic to see you in your home or park or wher...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 295, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...r idea or say NO to the issues that you dont agree with them, easily. As an evidence...
^^^^
Line 3, column 325, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... that you dont agree with them, easily. As an evidence consider that your friend w...
^^
Line 4, column 70, Rule ID: AS_TIME_PROGRESSED[1]
Message: Did you mean 'as time passed'?
Suggestion: as time passed
...bove, we may reach the conclusion that, as time progressed and the communication craft improves, i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 599, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...by new communication's facilities.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, so, for example, i mean, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 88.0 43.0788530466 204% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1998.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 428.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66822429907 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9676723574 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528037383178 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 631.8 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.8238144391 48.9658058833 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.8181818182 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4545454545 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.18181818182 5.45110844103 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228662565226 0.236089414692 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698128584456 0.076458572812 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102191216204 0.0737576698707 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161205795045 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.024445100319 0.0645574589148 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.