good teachers set challenging tasks for students.
A vast variety of students are for challenging tasks in schools and universities while, other are against it. Personally, I do believe that teachers who set challenging tasks for their students are good teachers. There are three main reasons to show why I have this preference. First and foremost, reading and memorizing some routine tasks that is thought from very first days of primary schools to the universities, would not be as efficient as challenging project or tasks. In other word, students often get use to read some lessons without even thinking and applying them in everyday life. Therefore, setting challenging tasks would be so valuable for students and it is preferred only by professional teachers who expect useful result from their works. My personal experiment is a good example of this. When I was attempting to learn English for the toefl exam, my teacher was so diligent, he advocated more time than it was determined for every session of class. Moreover, in each session he set so many task as our homework, in a way that, I felt stressed to not to have enough time to cover the home works. After passing about two month, I could see noticeable progress in all individuals, as, we were not comparable with ourselves before taking part in that class. Although, I did not believe in his work at first, I found that the challenging tasks during class time were so precious for me.
Moreover, it is in doing challenging tasks that we learn how to think and how to search about especial information. As we know, searching is a kind of skill which we should learn about it in education period, but, by doing some regular tasks we would not have opportunity to learn this skill effectively. As an example, when I was studying in high school, a professional teacher was teaching the biology course there. She was famous for setting unusual tasks for students and all students had negative attitude toward her. When I passed the biology course, I learned a myriads of useful skills which have not been thought up to that time. I learned all of those valuable things just because of different tasks asking us to do.
To sum up, it is just in challenging tasks set by good teachers that we would learn some valuable things such as searching effectively and thinking properly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 512, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...asks. In other word, students often get use to read some lessons without even think...
^^^
Line 1, column 1006, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun task seems to be countable; consider using: 'many tasks'.
Suggestion: many tasks
...ss. Moreover, in each session he set so many task as our homework, in a way that, I felt ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1140, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'month' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'months'.
Suggestion: months
...the home works. After passing about two month, I could see noticeable progress in all...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 567, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a myriad' or simply 'myriads'?
Suggestion: a myriad; myriads
... I passed the biology course, I learned a myriads of useful skills which have not been th...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, kind of, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1896.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 396.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78787878788 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67307254006 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527777777778 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 570.6 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Interrogative: 3.0 0.994623655914 302% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6853403185 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.333333333 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.16666666667 5.45110844103 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365596877326 0.236089414692 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124851645309 0.076458572812 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123309133807 0.0737576698707 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.274461050529 0.150856017488 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0815472088318 0.0645574589148 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 86.8835125448 75% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.