My hometown is Istanbul, huge and crowded city of Turkey, where traffic problems are genuinely getting worse every year. I would change lots of problems that cause traffic such as lack of metro system, rapid migration, and unplanned construction industries.
To begin with, there are literally very few metro stations and %20 percent of people, who live in the Istanbul, have an opportunity to reach metro system. Hence Metro system is not flexible enough to gain time because people walk too much in the metro. For example, I arranged with my friends to meet in the metro station but we did not exactly define the meeting point. So I tried to find my friend more than 30 minutes in the metro. If metro system expand 3 or 4 times, the traffic that occur in Istanbul would plummet.
Moreover, city is expanding every day without any systematic plans and this expanding creates more roads and vehicles. In planned cities, engineers initially devise roads and old city then they devise provinces however, In Istanbul, we have 10 or 12 quarters where have more than 1 million people. For example, when I was a kid, I used to play soccer in fields. My children don’t have a chance to play soccer in the fields now. So we should prevent new constructions in the city.
Last but not least, Roads do not have proper size for city. They are out of the date and people always park their vehicles to public roads. So it creates traffic through closing roads and polices are not care of this problem because they do as well. In my opinion, fines should be carry out for this problem and people might be afraid about fines.
In conclusion, I don’t deny that there may be other changes which can be well for our city, but taking all factors into careful analyzing, I allege that expanding metro system, stop migration and fixing road problems could figure out traffic problem in the Istanbul
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 156, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...e an opportunity to reach metro system. Hence Metro system is not flexible enough to ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1575.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 331.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7583081571 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37469538567 2.67179642975 89% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589123867069 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Interrogative: 3.0 0.994623655914 302% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5941567926 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6470588235 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4705882353 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11764705882 5.45110844103 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0441812951687 0.236089414692 19% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0148692224796 0.076458572812 19% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0234875078732 0.0737576698707 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0311886468632 0.150856017488 21% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.026328184437 0.0645574589148 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.