Recently, whether to work with groupmembers or to work just by oneself or not has become one of the most controversial topics among the general public. Some individuals are strong believers of independent work, while others prefer to work with team members. From my standpoint, I totally agree with the latter one that one should work in a group.
To begin with, cooperating with other people can help develop a good relationship with collegues, which may natually develop into friendship. To be more specific, interacting with team members, like discussing the topic of the project, talking about how the research will go on or solving the problem together, can boost the positive atomoshpere among people, which decrease the distance while increase the kindness. This kind of cooperation makes contributions to making friends. For example, during the time when I was doing a project with my classmates, whom I am unfamilar with at the beginning of the semestar, I have developed a fabulious friendship with one of my classmates, whose name is CIci. At that time, I felt frustrated and depressed when the problem puzzled me, afraid of affecting the procession of the project. Detecting my depressive motion, Cici came to help me find out the solution of my problems patiently and encouraging me to face up these issues confidently. With the favor of Cici, I excellently finished my own part and the project was handed in at time. Ever since then, Cici becomes my best friend. Therefore, I definitely believe that group work can bring people kind relationships and helps people make friends.
In addition, working with other group members saves a lot of time and is more efficient than working alone, for that group memebers can communicate with eacher other and when facing with tackles or meeting with conflicts, all the members in the group can resolve them together. Now matter how time-consuming the task is, if the whole team combine their talent and face with the problem together, the goal will be achieved successfully with higher quality and less time.
Furthermore, one can find out ones defeciency and learn from other members in the group.
Just as an old saying goes, ‘One can learn from every one beside him.’, we can find out others’ advantages and absorb what they do well. Besides, from comparing us with others, we can easily detect what we are in short of, such as patiency, inconfidence, unkindness and so on.
In conlusion, I strongly hold the opinion that the professor should require students work in group, which benefits students a lot.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 137, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...the most controversial topics among the general public. Some individuals are strong believers ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 193, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Some individuals are strong believers of independent work, while others prefer to...
^^
Line 3, column 891, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve motion, Cici came to help me find out the solution of my problems patiently an...
^^
Line 10, column 85, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at the professor should require students work in group, which benefits students a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, if, may, so, then, therefore, well, while, for example, in addition, in short, kind of, such as, talking about, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2154.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 428.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03271028037 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7682962374 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581775700935 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 652.5 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.6153503445 48.9658058833 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.666666667 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7777777778 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.44444444444 5.45110844103 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139867093585 0.236089414692 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529579223699 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.079065748321 0.0737576698707 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110163117469 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112688591356 0.0645574589148 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 86.8835125448 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.