Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
•Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.
•Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leade.
•Say nothing.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
From a broad perspective, in the current states of affair we face, in which people frequently encounter various new situations and challenges, it is not far-fetched to presume that showing proper reaction toward these innovate circumstances is the issue that distinguish people from each other. However, what is the suitable attitude when a talking is seemingly inaccurate highly depends in th lens through which one is looking. There is a hrowing segment of people who contend this idea that intervention in someone's talking is not apprpriate behavior. I personally concor with this statement, and in the ensuing paragraph, the rationale behind this opinion will be further elaborated.
First and most exquisite point coming the mind to substantitate my standpoint is concerned with the people's recongnition to evaluate the importance of both the issue and istuation. Hardly can anyone deny the fact that if the element of the human's judgement is introduced to the debates, the result can be completely varied. This happen intermittently has occured due to the various viewpoint of individuals to the particular condition. As an illustration, in a meeting, having listend to the leader's words, although someone has percieved it partially wrongly, he does not have any reaction to it since he has found it unimportant. On the other hand, another collegue has tyried to coorect the speaker's speach as he assed this inaccuracy to much greater that the first person. Subsequently, he thinks that this information may deviate the path of the meeting form its correct way. Undoubtedly, there are a not general rule whcih can be defined as a certain behavior when it is the perception of people's from the situation which determines their attitude.
Another vital fact which should be taken into consideration is the people's position that demonstrate their scope of behavior. Needless to say that each location requires specific actions. The atmosphere of a meeting that a person attended meresly as a audince entierly differs as a meeting that I particpated to judge the content in it. Admittedly, people can show a wide range of reaction when they have superior authority. Moreover, there are some principles which should be considered in social relationships that necessitates to not enterupt someone even if he speekcompletely wrong. These acceptable behaviors establish the findamental regulation within the society which their obeying is aboslute necessity.
To wrap it up, it is more judicious to say that neither entrupting someone's words nor having no raction toward it are not speciofied behavior in a certain circumstance. Not only do people behave acording to their knowledge and percpetion of that situation but also they should have reactions based on their social status by considering the social affairs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 557, Rule ID: PRP_RB_NO_VB[1]
Message: Are you missing a verb?
...s talking is not apprpriate behavior. I personally concor with this statement, and in the ensuing...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 240, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...eny the fact that if the element of the humans judgement is introduced to the debates,...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 250, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...eting that a person attended meresly as a audince entierly differs as a meeting t...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.0286738351 209% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.0752688172 297% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2374.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 447.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31096196868 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59808378696 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02257420701 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570469798658 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 738.9 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0958184901 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.947368421 100.406767564 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5263157895 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.84210526316 5.45110844103 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0824974483347 0.236089414692 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.02534552339 0.076458572812 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0283633341296 0.0737576698707 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0497637436011 0.150856017488 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0231943759158 0.0645574589148 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 11.7677419355 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 58.1214874552 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.01818996416 123% => OK
difficult_words: 145.0 86.8835125448 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.