The remarkable growth of technology during 20th has brought many outstanding benefits for human beings. Though it has not been clear of flaws, and it has targeted many facets of our societies from adults to adolescents. One of the most controversial question among people is whether Technology has made children less creative than the past? Many hold the opinion that it has turned them to more creative individuals than in the past. However, some has opposed this statement. The ensuing paragraphs will argue about the adverse effects of technology on the children's creativity.
First noteworthy reason to be mentioned is that technology somehow hinders the children to naturally play with their toys which has a substantial impact on their creativity. For instance, today's babies have more eagerness to play with their parents' cellphone, laptop, or iPad rather than their toys like dolls, playdoh, or paint a flower. As many statistics claim, playing with the toys has direct effects on our children's emotional and psychological growth. Therefore creativity as a component of babies' emotional development has been affected by the time.
Second, It may damage their emotional health since they want to spend less real time playing or hanging out with their peers. As its clear, most of our children have started using social media like Instagram or Facebook at very early ages, and they are getting used to hiding themselves behind the screens. This incidence will turn them to an antisocial, timid person who is weak to create the solutions when there is an issue communicating to hi/her real environment outside the social media. The frequent use of social media by young generation is a contemporary incidence which will make us think that technology's growth has harmed the children creativity.
Third, technology has made our children more aggressive than past. Such anger is because of many digital games which promote fights, wars, and killing. Psychologists claim this that people with higher violence has less emotional intelligence and creativity since their minds are occupied with rage. Psychologists have stated That negative feeling such as anger, depression, sadness stop Hypothalamus, which is responsible for the imaginary and creativity power working appropriately. As a result, we have seen less creative children based on the fact that these kinds of digital games were not available in the past.
All in all, the notions mentioned above will soon convince people who are delicate for their children bests that technology has had the negative impacts on our offspring as it turns them to antisocial and aggressive individuals with lesser creativity versus the previous decades. An inevitable question is whether the governments have to make very meticulous plans stopping the technologies' damaging effects on our children' creativity?
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 342, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many holds'.
Suggestion: Many holds
...e children less creative than the past? Many hold the opinion that it has turned them to ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 460, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ens emotional and psychological growth. Therefore creativity as a component of babies emo...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, may, second, so, therefore, third, for instance, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2416.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 450.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36888888889 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6057793516 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80237994093 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535555555556 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 736.2 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 4.94265232975 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7028156043 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.047619048 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.04761904762 5.45110844103 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237433407713 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0804142771913 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0853942075509 0.0737576698707 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14156188385 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0673006430552 0.0645574589148 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 86.8835125448 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.