It has been said, "Not everything that is learned is contained in books." Compare and contrast knowledge gained from experience with knowledge gained from books. In your opinion, which source is more important? Why?
When it comes to the issue the importance of experience, some people believe that the knowledge gained from real practice in more important than that of books. However, others maintain the opposite view. As far as I am concerned, the former point carries more weight. I take this position on account for the following reasons.
First and the most important reason is that for learning some knowledge or skills you have to use real practices. I think that a small example can give some light to this issue. If you want to learn to drive, you can go to a library and borrow some books, which have linked with driving. These books assist you to be familiar with traffic rules, traffic signs, or how to handle a car in a certain situation. You should be aware of this point that if you read all of them, you never can be a good driver. For achieve this, you have to drive a car in a real condition, and use the trail and error method for improve your driving shills.
A further point we must consider is that knowledge gained from experience is more effective. As we all know, students always learn plenty of theoretical matter in schools every year, but in a coming year, they usually cannot recall most of them. In developed Western country, for solving this problem schools use new method of teaching that students directly interact with the subject. This causes that they could use all of their senses for learning, and surely; they comprehend better curriculums. Recent researches show that the rate of students’ learning in these countries is at least twice as effective as undeveloped countries. So, the biggest advantage of using experience for learning lies in the fact that helps people to gain deeper understanding of their environment.
Apart from point I made above, experience puts first-hand information at our disposal. It is quite normal that books contain second-hand information, while the scenario is different for experience. I think that there is not a better example that America Space Agency. American's space scientists have abundant information of the mars, which is the fourth planet in the solar system, by sending satellites or robotic probes. Nevertheless, they detect that they should send some astronomers on this plant for gaining first-hand knowledge.
All above evidence supports the undeniable fact that knowledge gained through experience is different, effective, and original. Of course, as an English proverb goes “coin has two sides,” those who take the opposite view are partly reasonable that gaining knowledge from real practice usually is time-consuming. Nonetheless, I think that its benefits outweigh dangers. Last but not least, let us hope people gain the deeper insight that the book and experience supplementary each other.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 191, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...sh proverb goes 'coin has two sides,' those who take the opposite view are p...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 498, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd experience supplementary each other.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'nevertheless', 'nonetheless', 'second', 'so', 'while', 'apart from', 'at least', 'i think', 'of course']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.222222222222 0.229887763892 97% => OK
Verbs: 0.149425287356 0.158761421928 94% => OK
Adjectives: 0.105363984674 0.0866891130778 122% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0421455938697 0.046263068375 91% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0593869731801 0.0685040099705 87% => OK
Prepositions: 0.13601532567 0.118717715034 115% => OK
Participles: 0.0249042145594 0.0351676179071 71% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.75132261049 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0191570881226 0.0309702414327 62% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.10153256705 0.0887237588012 114% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0153256704981 0.0209618222197 73% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0095785440613 0.0139019557991 69% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2800.0 2387.08602151 117% => OK
No of words: 459.0 408.028673835 112% => OK
Chars per words: 6.10021786492 5.86048508987 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62863751936 4.48200974243 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.372549019608 0.338922669872 110% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.274509803922 0.251872472559 109% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.18954248366 0.174417080927 109% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.128540305011 0.112833075102 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75132261049 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553376906318 0.524397521467 106% => OK
Word variations: 66.5027464738 59.2087087015 112% => OK
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6684587814 121% => OK
Sentence length: 18.36 20.5533526081 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0626712475 48.84282405 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 120.699889404 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.36 20.5533526081 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.52 0.644075263715 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.54480286738 36% => OK
Readability: 45.8109803922 45.7405998639 100% => OK
Elegance: 1.52671755725 1.45489161554 105% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285804683603 0.300154397459 95% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0841657300952 0.103427244359 81% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0630030842433 0.0752933317313 84% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.472898232464 0.497263757937 95% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.105755408038 0.151897553556 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0935635866742 0.114077575197 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0840053023261 0.0781384742642 108% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.247231683149 0.336927656856 73% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0377253944688 0.067059652881 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183111804307 0.210909579961 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447313223491 0.0618886996521 72% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8870967742 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.86379928315 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.91756272401 142% => OK
Positive topic words: 12.0 8.42114695341 142% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.4623655914 81% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.75985663082 72% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.6433691756 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.