Many filmmakers make movies based on books. When a movie is produced based on books, some people prefer to read books before watching films, other people choose to watch the movie first. Which one do you think is better? Why?
Watching movie or reading book? This is a controversial question between people who want to fill their free times. Some people inclined to watching movies, while there is a group of people that have a penchant for reading books, and each of these has many proofs for themselves. Regarding this, there are many film producer making movies based on books. In this case, although some people prefer to watch movies before reading books, I have a different point of view. As far as I am concerned, I prefer to read books completely at first. There are numerous reasons for this, two of which - that is - more details in the book, and not manipulated story, are the most outstanding ones.
To begin with, the most striking reason why I prefer to read books before watching movies is the fact that books not limited to time and authors can relate the story with more details. Filmmakers have to relate their story in a limited time, two or maximum three hours, while time is not a limitation for authors, and they can write their story in a book with thousands of pages or even in 2 or 3 volume. Therefore filmmakers should neglect many details, while author by enjoying their innovative mind and imagination tools can tell more details about the story and bring their readers into the role of story’s characters. For example, I remember many years ago, when I read one of the J.K Rowling’s book, in the series of Harry Potter, a movie was produced based on this story. I watched that movie but I was so disappointed because the movie had little details and could not attract me.
Another equally important point is that film procedures sometimes change the story based on their desire or some limitation. For instance, I remember a series that would be produced based on a historical story. Unfortunately, among the production, one of the performers who has a significant role in the movie decides to cut her contribution with the group. So procedure had to change the story of the movie until he could found new performers. In my opinion, these changes can ruin whatever author wants to tell in the story. On the other hand, all the characters of a book are available to authors, so he or she can relate the story whatever wants.
All in all, with all this taken in to account, although some people are attracted by movies, since authors are more capable to write a story than filmmakers, I prefer to read the original story with the all details that author wants to tell instead of manipulated one.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 406, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ands of pages or even in 2 or 3 volume. Therefore filmmakers should neglect many details,...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 694, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: K
...any years ago, when I read one of the J.K Rowling's book, in the series of H...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, regarding, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2075.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 440.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71590909091 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57940480929 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470454545455 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 650.7 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.357828469 48.9658058833 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.210526316 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1578947368 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47368421053 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358710298366 0.236089414692 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134277538882 0.076458572812 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117577200668 0.0737576698707 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211778356473 0.150856017488 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.140352833196 0.0645574589148 217% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.