Nowadays people are more willing to help, they did not know for example, by giving clothes or food to people who need them than they were in the past. To what extend do you agree?
Since the down of civilization poverty has played significant role in human life. However, people of all societies has been trying to somehow help people who are in needs. A controversial question which is often raised regarding this issue is related to extend to which people participate in these kinds of activities during history. Some people are inclined toward this opinion that in the past people were more active in this regard while others look at this topic through different lens, and believe that nowadays, people are more concerned. Personally I am more in agreement with the latter group. In the following paragraph, some conspicuous reasons will cogently substantiate my perspective.
The first noteworthy point regarding this issue is the publicity. Today mass media, like TV channels or newspaper, are always run some kind of program or article about the poverty and its consequence on society. As a result, people are more alert toward this problem, and they try more initiatives to cure it. For example, because of the educational programs on TV about the homeless people, most of the younger generation are fully aware of this problem. Hence, the number of people who try to help homeless ones have been increased dramatically.
Another reason which deserve some words here is the motivation offered from government. Many governments offer some kind of tax relief to firms or companies which put aside some of their fund to help the people in needs. It is a great incentive for many CEO to increase their participation in this field. For instance, as a result of tax regulation, according to which the percentage of taxable goods are less in firm with social activities than the other firms, my own company recently assigned 10 percent of its fund for helping poor people.
Finally, in addition to what was mentioned before, as recent studies have revealed, the number of charity organization which are active nowadays are far more than past. In fact, according a study which was conducted in 30 state of USA, the number of these organization had roughly 20 percent increased. Hence, the amount of help which is offered to poor people has increased accordingly too.
To make a long story short, all the aforementioned reasons lead me to this conclusion that today, people offer more help to people who are in needs of help, than before. However, that was a story in nutshell; actually, there are some reasons and example, challenging the claim, which are not mentioned above, hence, it is suggested that a survey be conducted to find out the exact situation involved in this issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Since the down of civilization poverty has pl...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 249, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun CEO seems to be countable; consider using: 'many '.
Suggestion: many
...e in needs. It is a great incentive for many CEO to increase their participation in this...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 250, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this organization' or 'these organizations'?
Suggestion: this organization; these organizations
...ucted in 30 state of USA, the number of these organization had roughly 20 percent increased. Hence...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['accordingly', 'actually', 'finally', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'regarding', 'so', 'while', 'for example', 'for instance', 'in addition', 'in fact', 'kind of', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.25826446281 0.229887763892 112% => OK
Verbs: 0.159090909091 0.158761421928 100% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0764462809917 0.0866891130778 88% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0495867768595 0.046263068375 107% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0247933884298 0.0685040099705 36% => OK
Prepositions: 0.134297520661 0.118717715034 113% => OK
Participles: 0.0495867768595 0.0351676179071 141% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.69702306307 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0309917355372 0.0309702414327 100% => OK
Particles: 0.00413223140496 0.00188951952338 219% => OK
Determiners: 0.105371900826 0.0887237588012 119% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00206611570248 0.0209618222197 10% => Some modal verbs wanted.
WH_determiners: 0.0268595041322 0.0139019557991 193% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2602.0 2387.08602151 109% => OK
No of words: 434.0 408.028673835 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.99539170507 5.86048508987 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.48200974243 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.364055299539 0.338922669872 107% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.251152073733 0.251872472559 100% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.179723502304 0.174417080927 103% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.129032258065 0.112833075102 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69702306307 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541474654378 0.524397521467 103% => OK
Word variations: 63.1089917887 59.2087087015 107% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6684587814 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.7 20.5533526081 106% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.46418548 48.84282405 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.1 120.699889404 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7 20.5533526081 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.85 0.644075263715 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.54480286738 54% => OK
Readability: 46.8152073733 45.7405998639 102% => OK
Elegance: 1.89380530973 1.45489161554 130% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362395585087 0.300154397459 121% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.106311113341 0.103427244359 103% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0554404138319 0.0752933317313 74% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.52162065252 0.497263757937 105% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.148018521389 0.151897553556 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1396355417 0.114077575197 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0807062034069 0.0781384742642 103% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.347873106904 0.336927656856 103% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0113430859989 0.067059652881 17% => Paragraphs are so close to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246881133926 0.210909579961 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0400265994691 0.0618886996521 65% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8870967742 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.86379928315 155% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.91756272401 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 8.42114695341 107% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 2.4623655914 203% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.75985663082 72% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.6433691756 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.